My Math Forum An elementary proof of the Fermat’s Last Theorem

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

April 10th, 2017, 06:35 PM   #121
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2016
From: Australia

Posts: 989
Thanks: 350

Math Focus: Yet to find out.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by topsquark Could you do a plain old Physicist a favor and run through that for n = 3 or something? -Dan
I love that talk.

April 12th, 2017, 07:30 AM   #122
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 122
Thanks: 1

Quote:
 Originally Posted by McPogor I understand your assumptions in 2*) (despite some typo) but the way you came to conclusion in 3a*) that A+B-C=0 is absolutely unclear. I can prove that A+B>C. I looked through your Russian articles but it did not help much to my understanding.
The answer to all questions is guaranteed.

 April 14th, 2017, 06:54 AM #123 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 122 Thanks: 1 Are the axioms of mathematics wrong? WHY a raising of the digit by digit EQUALITY (in basis n) $\displaystyle 2^{nn}==(xn^2+2^{nn})(yn^2+1)$ mod $\displaystyle n^3$, where n is a prime number, n>2, x and y are digits y ≠ 0, [and x + 2y==0 mod n], in the (n-1)-th power, it turns into an INEQUALITY [and x + 4y==0 mod n]?
 April 19th, 2017, 07:43 AM #124 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 122 Thanks: 1 nn=n*n=n^2

 Tags elementary, fermat's, fermat’s, proof, theorem

,

,

,

### fermats last theorem elem

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post talisman Real Analysis 0 November 1st, 2012 04:16 AM MrAwojobi Number Theory 17 September 2nd, 2011 11:04 AM george gill Calculus 5 May 14th, 2011 02:13 PM meteuzun Number Theory 3 February 10th, 2010 01:10 PM HairOnABiscuit Real Analysis 4 December 17th, 2009 12:37 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Top