My Math Forum Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 ...?

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 November 4th, 2010, 09:13 PM #1 Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 ...? where the next number has n+1 divisors of the previous number in the sequence, and is the lowest number with that many divisors Code: number divisors 1 1 2 1,2 6 1,2,3 12 1,2,3,4 24 1,2,3,4,6 48 1,2,3,4,6,8 .... How would one express the sequence mathematically? Is the sequence interesting?
 November 4th, 2010, 09:58 PM #2 Global Moderator     Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City Posts: 6,342 Thanks: 404 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 . Your example has omissions: Code: number divisors 1 1 2 1,2 6 1,2,3 12 1,2,3,4,6 24 1,2,3,4,6,12 48 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24
 November 4th, 2010, 10:06 PM #3 Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 . Thanks...that leads me directly to another question How is it determined that there isn't a number, less than 48, with 7 divisors?
November 4th, 2010, 10:12 PM   #4

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 13
Thanks: 0

Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by greg1313 Your example has omissions:
where's 36??

November 4th, 2010, 10:30 PM   #5

Joined: Nov 2010

Posts: 7
Thanks: 0

Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 .

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoracle
Quote:
 Originally Posted by greg1313 Your example has omissions:
where's 36??
36 has divisors 1,2,3,4,6...the same as 24, therefore it is trumped by 24, as it is the lower of the two.

November 4th, 2010, 10:39 PM   #6

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 105
Thanks: 0

Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lupeto Thanks...that leads me directly to another question How is it determined that there isn't a number, less than 48, with 7 divisors?

Every integer has an even number of divisors, correct? Unless it is a perfect square. Therefore, it is trivial to check 9, 16, 25, 36, etc...

November 4th, 2010, 10:58 PM   #7
Global Moderator

Joined: Oct 2008
From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City

Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 404

Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond
Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lupeto where the next number has n+1 divisors of the previous number in the sequence, and is the lowest number with that many divisors Code: number divisors 1 1 2 1,2 6 1,2,3 12 1,2,3,4 24 1,2,3,4,6 48 1,2,3,4,6,8 ....
The above table is incomplete -- here is a complete version:

Code:
1    1
2    1, 2
6    1, 2, 3
12  1, 2, 3, 4, 6
24  1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12
48  1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lupeto 36 has divisors 1,2,3,4,6...the same as 24, therefore it is trumped by 24, as it is the lower of the two.
36 has 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 as divisors (not including 36).
24 has 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12 as divisors (not including 24).

The pattern does not hold (per example); for example 6 has 3 divisors (not including 6) and 12 has 5 divisors (not including 12) and there is no number between 6 and 12 that has 4 divisors if that number is not included as a divisor.

 November 4th, 2010, 11:06 PM #8 Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 . Doh...of course...I was so intrigued by the mathematics of it, I didn't go back and check whether the statement or example were sound before posting it up! Is it OK to evolve the thought? As you're pointed out, n+1 divisors cannot hold...in that case, how would the sequence be if the statement was edited as follows? "where the next number has more divisors than the previous number in the sequence, and is the lowest number with that many divisors"
November 5th, 2010, 12:18 AM   #9
Global Moderator

Joined: Oct 2008
From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City

Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 404

Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond
Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 .

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lupeto "where the next number has more divisors than the previous number in the sequence, and is the lowest number with that many divisors"
I'd imagine that's possible.

Maybe the n+1 idea holds (with a different table).
Here's a start:

Code:
1     1
2     1, 2
6     1, 2, 3
16   1, 2, 4, 8
18   1, 2, 3, 6, 9
30   1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15
42   1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21
256 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 54, 128
I don't know if there is a number between 42 and 256 with 8 divisors (not including the number itself).

Perhaps of interest:

Code:
2^1    1, 2
2^2    1, 2, 4
2^3    1, 2, 4, 8
2^4    1, 2, 4, 8, 16
A handy site: http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/

 November 5th, 2010, 12:27 AM #10 Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Re: Does anyone recognise the sequence 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 . Actually, if it's legal to include 1, then should it be permitted to use the number itself? How does the sequence look then? As soon as you get over half a dozen divisors, it becomes really laborious to check candidates. Currently also mulling the significance of the binary sequence...v.interesting

 Tags recognise, sequence

,

,

### 2 4 6 12 24

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post taylor_1989_2012 Algebra 4 February 12th, 2013 05:58 PM Albert.Teng Algebra 2 October 5th, 2012 06:14 PM 15sliu Elementary Math 0 November 14th, 2010 07:32 AM elim Real Analysis 8 May 23rd, 2010 12:23 PM babyRudin Real Analysis 6 October 10th, 2008 11:11 AM

 Contact - Home - Top