My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Welcome > New Users

New Users Post up here and introduce yourself!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
May 13th, 2013, 06:51 PM   #1
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 14,597
Thanks: 1038

Confusing...

Found this; I simply can't follow it...
Anybody understand it?

The three bears were sitting down to eat their porridge. It should have been a happy family occasion, but it soon became apparent to everyone that something was wrong. "Who's been eating my porridge?" they all cried, but the fact was, they'd eaten each others'! Mummy Bear had eaten half the amount that Daddy Bear would have had left in his bowl if only he had eaten from his bowl and no-one else. Now, Baby Bear originally had 30 spoonfuls in his bowl, Mummy Bear had 60 and Daddy Bear had 90. Baby Bear had eaten half the amount that Mummy Bear would have had left in her bowl if only Daddy Bear had eaten from her bowl and had eaten one third of his actual total consumption. Daddy Bear had eaten the amount that Baby Bear would have had left if only Mummy Bear had eaten from Baby Bear's bowl and had eaten one third of her actual total consumption. How many spoonfuls of porridge had each bear eaten?
Denis is offline  
 
May 15th, 2013, 10:42 AM   #2
jks
Senior Member
 
jks's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2012
From: DFW Area

Posts: 642
Thanks: 99

Math Focus: Electrical Engineering Applications
Re: Confusing...

Hi [color=#00BF00]Denis[/color],

Here is what I get but it is lunch time and I did not get to check it:

is the amount mommy bear eats.

is the amount baby bear eats.

is the amount daddy bear eats.

Quote:
Now, Baby Bear originally had 30 spoonfuls in his bowl, Mummy Bear had 60 and Daddy Bear had 90.
Quote:
Mummy Bear had eaten half the amount that Daddy Bear would have had left in his bowl if only he had eaten from his bowl and no-one else.
[1]

Quote:
Baby Bear had eaten half the amount that Mummy Bear would have had left in her bowl if only Daddy Bear had eaten from her bowl and had eaten one third of his actual total consumption.
[2]

Quote:
Daddy Bear had eaten the amount that Baby Bear would have had left if only Mummy Bear had eaten from Baby Bear's bowl and had eaten one third of her actual total consumption.
[3]

Combining [1] and [3]:



So:



Plugging this value for into [3] and solving for the unknown gives:



Finally, may be solved by plugging this value for into [2] and solving which gives:

jks is offline  
May 15th, 2013, 04:11 PM   #3
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 14,597
Thanks: 1038

Re: Confusing...

Gotcha! Thanks, JKS.
I was assuming this meant each only ate from the other's bowls, not from their own:
"... but the fact was, they'd eaten each others'! "
Denis is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > Welcome > New Users

Tags
confusing



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
neither is neither? confusing logic. pinappleburger Algebra 2 November 3rd, 2013 01:15 AM
confusing Emilijo Number Theory 2 December 29th, 2011 01:15 PM
Probablity !!!! Confusing daivinhtran Algebra 4 June 11th, 2011 11:49 PM
Probability, help me, please, So confusing daivinhtran Probability and Statistics 1 March 29th, 2011 04:53 PM
A confusing proof chris99191 Algebra 10 March 20th, 2011 05:39 PM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.