
New Users Post up here and introduce yourself! 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
September 25th, 2019, 10:57 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Sep 2019 From: Ohio Posts: 4 Thanks: 0  (!MUST READ!) So, I found this odd sequence...
I was fiddling around with some square numbers two days ago, when I started doing this (finding differences): 0,1,4,9,16,25,36,49,64,81,100,121,144,169 1,3,5,7, 9 ,11,13, and you see where this is going. All the numbers in this row are odd numbers, two different. What about cubed... 0, 1 , 8 , 27,64,125,216,343,... 1, 7 ,19,37 ,61, 91 ,127,... (continuing) 6,12,18,24 ,30, 36 , and now we have six different. Now here, I went to the 4th power: 0 , 1 , 16 , 81 ,256,625,1296,2401,... 1 ,15, 65 ,175,369,671,1105,... 14,50,110,194,302,434,... 36,60, 84 ,108,132,... 24,24, 24 , 24 , and now we have 24. 0th power does this: 0,0,0,0,0,... 0,0,0,0,... (you get it) 1st power is this: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,... 1,1,1,1,1,1, and now 1s. Next, I arranged them like this: 0,1,2,6,24,... And before I go on, I would like to note something. From one onward, if you multiply the 1 by two, you get the next object in the sequence, 2. 2*3=6, 6*4=24. I have confirmed this up until the multiplication by seven. So why is 0*1=1? Anyway, proceeding: 0 , 1 , 2 , 6 , 24 ,120,720,... 1 , 1 , 4 , 18 , 96 ,600,... 0 , 3 , 14 , 78 ,504,... 3 , 11 , 64 ,426,... 8 , 53 ,362,... 45 ,309,... 264,... Now, this may be infinite, but, using the information that you gleaned from this, I would like an equation, a possible answer to the 0,1,2,6,24... sequence, and I would like to know a way to submit this as an unsolved problem in math. This may be unsolvable, just to let you know. It appears that the multiplication rate is higher than the deduction rate. But, this may work against itself. And for right now, I would be happy to leave the answer at, of course, 42. 
September 25th, 2019, 08:02 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada  The Forest City Posts: 7,968 Thanks: 1152 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond  
September 25th, 2019, 08:29 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 670 Thanks: 440 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics 
The sequence you discovered is the factorial sequence. By definition, $n! = n(n1)(n2)\dots (2)(1)$ and by definition 0! = 1. There is a good reason for this but its besides the point at present. So the first few factorials are: $0! = 1, 1! = 1, 2! = 2, 3! = 6, 4! = 24, 5! = 120, 6! = 720$, etc etc. See the following link for more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial Now, the reason they appear in your construction is the following. The first is that consecutive integer powers like you are computing are given by the binomial theorem as \[(m+1)^k  m^k = \sum_{k = 0}^n \binom{n}{k} m^k  m^n = \sum_{k = 0}^{n1} \binom{n}{k} m^k \] Notice that this is a polynomial expression in $m$. Then the divided difference formula for polynomial interpolates guarantees that after taking divided differences $n$ times, the resulting differences will become constant. See the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_polynomial Now, why should that constant be exactly $n!$? That is because these divided differences end up giving multiples of the coefficients of the derivative of the polynomial. The last divided difference which results in those constant terms is the result of taking $n1$ derivatives of a polynomial of degree $n1$. The leading term has the form $\binom{n}{1}m^{n1} = n m^{n1}$ and notice it is the only term which contributes to this derivative. So after taking $n1$ derivatives we have \[ \frac{d^{n1}}{dx^{n1}}n m^{n1} = n(n1)! = n!\] which is the constant appearing in your divided differences. 
September 26th, 2019, 03:24 AM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: Universe 2.71828i3.14159 Posts: 132 Thanks: 49 Math Focus: Area of Circle 
oeis.org has almost all possible integer sequences.

September 26th, 2019, 05:25 PM  #5 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2009 From: Northwest Arkansas Posts: 2,767 Thanks: 5  
September 27th, 2019, 07:14 AM  #6 
Global Moderator Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada  The Forest City Posts: 7,968 Thanks: 1152 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond  
September 27th, 2019, 08:26 AM  #7 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: Universe 2.71828i3.14159 Posts: 132 Thanks: 49 Math Focus: Area of Circle  
September 30th, 2019, 06:32 AM  #8 
Newbie Joined: Sep 2019 From: Ohio Posts: 4 Thanks: 0 
Thanks, but i don't have that understanding. English please?

September 30th, 2019, 07:16 AM  #9  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,690 Thanks: 2669 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
Quote:
This technique generalises for any polynomial expression and can be used to determine a polynomial that generates any given finite sequence of numbers. Reference: https://www.purplemath.com/modules/nextnumb.htm None of this is particularly relevant to your final sequence of course, because that isn't generated by a polynomial. Last edited by skipjack; October 1st, 2019 at 03:02 PM.  
September 30th, 2019, 11:33 AM  #10 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,690 Thanks: 2669 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Actually, having reread, I now see where your final sequence comes from and you will see that SDK's post contains the information that joins the dots.


Tags 
found, odd, read, sequence 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
How would you read this?  GIjoefan1976  Algebra  2  April 14th, 2017 06:54 PM 
How was the formula for kinetic energy found, and who found it?  Ganesh Ujwal  Physics  3  January 5th, 2015 01:58 AM 
New primer sequence is found  miket  Number Theory  11  May 9th, 2013 06:28 AM 
My found integral vs Wolfram Alpha's found integral  Obsessed_Math  Calculus  4  February 9th, 2012 03:18 PM 
How would you read this  Sasha  Calculus  2  February 3rd, 2012 11:19 AM 