
Math General Math Forum  For general math related discussion and news 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
March 27th, 2015, 05:38 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Mar 2015 From: Belmont, CA Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Simple Proof for FLT? With some highschool calculus and simple reasoning, this proof aims to show in less than 5 minutes that there's a much, much simpler way to proof FLT than Wiles did in 1995. (At least, that's what I think, though I find it hard to believe it could be really that easy.) So what am I missing? Where's the flaw? Let me know what you think! https://www.dropbox.com/s/elzeug6ub8wvnu3/FLT.pdf?dl=0 
March 27th, 2015, 10:25 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  
March 27th, 2015, 10:57 PM  #3 
Newbie Joined: Mar 2015 From: Belmont, CA Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  

Tags 
flt, proof, simple 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
x^n+y^n=z^n simple proof for n>2  M_B_S  Number Theory  4  November 19th, 2014 05:49 AM 
Simple Proof  TomCadwallader  Algebra  1  October 18th, 2014 03:19 PM 
Help with simple proof  khhyle  Applied Math  3  February 8th, 2013 08:35 PM 
Simple Proof Help....  soulrain  Applied Math  10  July 9th, 2012 11:58 AM 
Simple proof  temp_tsu  Applied Math  1  September 21st, 2008 03:59 PM 