
Math General Math Forum  For general math related discussion and news 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
September 11th, 2014, 11:39 PM  #11  
Newbie Joined: May 2014 From: InOnePlaceorOther Posts: 21 Thanks: 1 
Yes, what I have been talking about is flatspace. Though, what I am wondering is if, given Euclidian space in ANY dimensionality (3d+), will the laws of the 2d shapes remain laws?(granted they are possibly only mental but they still have set laws.) Is the above absolute truth or relative truth? Lets see... I think that it may be true that the only way to alter this may be to change logic. In any case: 1. A triangle is 3 straight sides and three lines, not only three 2. A square is 4 straight lines and four points, not only three Now what I am asking is: can you take something that is VISIBLY three sides and it is still somehow a square? Or how about this: Can three sides ever ACTUALLY be four sides? Quote:
You say definitions and axioms. What I am saying is: with a fixed definition and a fixed axiomatic system, does that set what comes next as absolute within that system or is it relative? It is a bit like, "we set the rules of chess to say you cannot move a rook diagonally." So UNDER that rule, we can't move it. Though if someone is able to shift higher reality around so that illogic can exist, then the diagonal thing broke down potentially. What I am wondering is, can this happen with math? You mentioned the logic idea already, I was wondering if you had any other ideas which could lead to it? (Besides interchangeable definitions and axioms) ***** One more thing, about the supposed nonexistence of 2d space. It is a concept that I am still thinking through, though this is what I have come up with so far: In one aspect, 2d space wouldn't be assumed to exist if one of its dimensions, thus supposedly the whole thing, is 0. In another, however, 2d space does exist in our conscious observation. When you look at the screen you are looking at, if you are far enough away, it ONLY has 2 dimensions to your conscious observation at the time. In that sense you actually are witnessing 2 dimensions. Also if you look at the blueness of the sky, you only see a slice. The image before you is 2d and planar. If you have a cube (in real life) and are only seeing one face , how are you not perceiving something which is only 2d? Last edited by Awake; September 11th, 2014 at 11:47 PM.  

Tags 
absolute, counteract, dimensions, higher, math, quantum mechanics, quantum physics, rules, universe 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Is the Universe Actually Made of Math?  STV  New Users  25  June 20th, 2014 02:12 AM 
Visual Refs for higher level math?  Vinh  Math Books  0  October 12th, 2013 07:14 AM 
Equation of a line in higher dimensions  eddybob123  Algebra  4  June 17th, 2013 11:15 AM 
how to find a higher power (math question, NOT religious!)  empiricus  Algebra  2  December 11th, 2010 09:29 AM 