My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
May 16th, 2014, 11:09 PM   #11
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 13,640
Thanks: 954

...perhaps you can pray that Momma wakes up with 12 fingers...
Denis is offline  
 
May 17th, 2014, 12:33 AM   #12
Math Team
 
topsquark's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2013
From: The Astral plane

Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 775

Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
I like base 20. I've leaned a way to count that on my fingers and it's great for providing some distraction at a graduation ceremony.

Frankly, after base 10 I'd go to base 6 = 2 x 3. Then maybe progress to base 30 = 2 x 3 x 5. The prime factors just seem easier for me to deal with.

-Dan
topsquark is offline  
May 17th, 2014, 07:55 AM   #13
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,515
Thanks: 2515

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
How many fewer digits are you going to use? Is it really going to save much? I can't see any need to shave a digit or two off figures in the world. Certainly not when there's re'education costs.

And if you are trying to work out what power of twelve you need for 37 million, you are working in base 10 and converting to base 12 which is terriblly inefficient.
v8archie is offline  
May 17th, 2014, 10:08 AM   #14
Global Moderator
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
From: UTC -5

Posts: 16,046
Thanks: 938

Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms
I think you need to think carefully about what you mean by "more efficient". If you only meant that it takes fewer symbols to encode (large) numbers, why not use base one million?

For a reasonable definition of "most efficient" the most efficient integer base is 3. But there are many, many ways to define this, and you can come up with lots of different answers.
CRGreathouse is offline  
May 17th, 2014, 01:00 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 246
Thanks: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by v8archie View Post
How many fewer digits are you going to use? Is it really going to save much? I can't see any need to shave a digit or two off figures in the world. Certainly not when there's re'education costs.

And if you are trying to work out what power of twelve you need for 37 million, you are working in base 10 and converting to base 12 which is terriblly inefficient.
yes but it is sometimes needed because I will come across scientific notation in base 10 and want to convert it to base 12.

I would say though that converting 37 trillion from base 10 to base 12 takes many less mod 12^x equations than converting that same number to binary using mod 2^x.

as for saving digits if you take 1 trillion, that is 10^12. That same 13 digit number expressed in base 12 I bet will have many less digits because powers of 12 go up much faster than powers of 10. It might not have an effect much in tens and hundreds but as you go to thousands and millions and above it really takes effect. In the same way binary numbers are the longest because 2^x is the slowest of the integer exponential functions(by that I mean some integer taken to some power that doesn't have to be an integer)

Last edited by caters; May 17th, 2014 at 01:06 PM.
caters is offline  
May 17th, 2014, 02:02 PM   #16
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,515
Thanks: 2515

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
And how often do you see (far less use) a 13 digit number writtten out? We almost alway write 1 trillion, or 2.5 trillion or something similar.

The main use for binary is in computers where it is used because it is easiest to tell whether a bit is on or off without error. We might be able to do ternary arithmetic in computing now (and maybe a little more at a push), but binary dovetails nicely with the logical side of computing too.
v8archie is offline  
May 17th, 2014, 06:53 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 246
Thanks: 2

I actually see 13 digit numbers written out quite often, mostly in repeating decimals.
caters is offline  
June 24th, 2014, 10:26 PM   #18
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Feb 2013

Posts: 224
Thanks: 6

Quote:
Originally Posted by caters View Post
The other day I asked my momma whether when momma and I go to New Earth . . .
I hope that is hypothetical, because if you do talk like that, you and your momma can use whatever system you please.

In essence we use use ALL bases already.

binary for computers
12 for inches and a dozen eggs in a carton.
60 minutes, 60 seconds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Denis View Post
...perhaps you can pray that Momma wakes up with 12 fingers...
Perfect. Digits MEANS fingers.
long_quach is offline  
June 25th, 2014, 05:10 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
tahirimanov's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2013
From: Baku

Posts: 502
Thanks: 56

Math Focus: Geometry
Smart people use metric system. Perhaps, we should use dozenal version of metric system.
tahirimanov is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Tags
base, decision



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decision Analysis p.lucia.p Economics 0 November 8th, 2013 03:43 AM
Need help with a career decision SportsFan Economics 0 May 14th, 2011 05:40 PM
Decision Analysis aspirare21a Economics 1 April 1st, 2011 12:04 PM
Base Conversion - Negative Base Tapas Bose Number Theory 10 August 6th, 2010 01:07 PM
Finding smallest n : (base^n + base^(n-1) + ... base^1) > x momesana Algebra 4 December 3rd, 2009 07:13 PM





Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.