
Math General Math Forum  For general math related discussion and news 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
February 10th, 2019, 09:10 AM  #11 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,310 Thanks: 551 
The problem is so vaguely stated as to be almost impossible to respond to. Yes, if you have a data set where numbers lower than the mean are more desirable, of "higher value" in economic jargon, than numbers equal to or greater than the mean, then using the standard deviation as a criterion of desirability does not make sense. In that case, some other criterion, perhaps skew or possibly a specially designed statistic, would make sense. We choose our tools to fit the task at hand. But once you start talking about beta, you are well into the realm of financial economics. As I have explained, risk in economics is concerned with variance around the expected value (mean); indeed, risk is quantitatively defined in terms of the standard deviation around the expected value. And it is assumed, as an empirical matter, that as the variance around the expected value increases, the market value usually decreases. Consequently, in theory, which abstracts from temporary deviations from the normal, market value is assumed to be a function of expected value and risk, with a positive partial differential with respect to expected value and a negative partial differential with respect to risk. Now you seem to have confused beta with the standard deviation. A standard definition of beta is the variance of one data set divided by its covariance with another data set. So beta is not a measure of one data set on its own. It is a measure that by its terms compares one data set against another data set. Strictly speaking, it is not even meaningful to talk about a data set's beta; it makes sense only with respect to two different data sets. Now in practice, a data set is usually being compared to a standard reference data set that is not explicitly mentioned but implicitly understood. In that case, people do refer to a data set's beta, but there are two data sets in mind. So to take a simple concrete example, if a stock has a beta < 1 when compared to a general index of stocks, the probability is that you will lose relative to the stock market if the market in general goes up. If a stock has a beta > 1 when compared to a general index of stocks, you will lose relative to the stock market if the market in general goes down. Beta tells you under what circumstances a specific stock will probably outperform the market and under what circumstances a specific stock will probably underperform the market. The greater the deviation, the worse off you will probably be if the market goes in a direction opposite to your expectations. Talking about beta as though it is a standard deviation is to show ignorance of what beta is. Last edited by JeffM1; February 10th, 2019 at 09:55 AM. 
February 10th, 2019, 10:26 AM  #12  
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,310 Thanks: 551  Quote:
Moreover, in economics, the degree to which higher numbers have higher value is shown by the numbers themselves. Are you under some delusion that "value" is determined solely by the standard deviation? Where did you get that weird idea from?  

Tags 
criticism, deviation, foundational, standard, standard deviation 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Average Mean Deviation VS. Standard Deviation  John Travolski  Probability and Statistics  1  July 14th, 2016 01:21 PM 
Standard Deviation  bilano99  Algebra  3  March 21st, 2012 10:20 PM 
Standard Deviation  cenanvy  Algebra  3  March 1st, 2012 12:24 PM 
Standard deviation VS Mean absolute deviation  Axel  Algebra  2  April 28th, 2011 03:25 AM 
Standard deviation  emtswife  Algebra  3  January 31st, 2008 01:21 AM 