February 10th, 2019, 08:14 AM  #11  
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2015 From: somewhere Posts: 534 Thanks: 81  Quote:
And different results may happen only if the ratio of change is observed in a different way. Last edited by idontknow; February 10th, 2019 at 08:20 AM.  
February 10th, 2019, 08:36 AM  #12 
Newbie Joined: Feb 2019 From: 48/3 Maniya Housing Society Khalid Bin Waleed Road Karachi Pakistan Posts: 14 Thanks: 0 Math Focus: Foundations, Philosophy 
I don’t think you understand why I wrote it. I was seeking help in developing the definition of x*delta x. But, you seem to not understand my method at all. So, it is useless in this case.

February 10th, 2019, 08:38 AM  #13 
Newbie Joined: Feb 2019 From: 48/3 Maniya Housing Society Khalid Bin Waleed Road Karachi Pakistan Posts: 14 Thanks: 0 Math Focus: Foundations, Philosophy 
idontknow I will use Latex tomorrow. You could also look at the derivative of nx.

February 10th, 2019, 09:39 AM  #14 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2642 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  
February 10th, 2019, 10:27 AM  #15 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 619 Thanks: 391 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics 
Not to be offensive, but your writing is completely unclear. It reads like a serial killer's manifesto scrawled onto a prison wall after being in solitary. What is worse is that you think it's somehow the fault of the reader so let's start there. The people you are claiming "don't understand" your work, are people who do understand math. They don't understand your work, because it isn't math. You are repeatedly either using words which don't have any known mathematical definition and then refusing to define them, or using mathematical words in contexts which have no meaning whatsoever. For some examples, you wrote both of the following "Nonexistence is not a finite quantity." "as space gets lesser and lesser, it converges to a finite point e" Neither of these has any meaning or conveys anything. It's just word salad with some words that have a meaning in math, thrown together in sentences that are meaningless in context. This has all the markings of a crackpot, which is what I assume to be the case. Nevertheless, some people here do try to reach out and give crackpots the benefit of the doubt or try to correct their misunderstandings (bless their patient hearts). Let me try to summarize the main point of their posts thus far. If you have a "new" method for computing the "derivative" and it gives a different answer than the current method for ANY function at ANY value, then your method is wrong. In the best case scenario, you have a new concept which might be useful, i.e. something that IS NOT the derivative, but is nevertheless useful in some way. In the worst case, your computations are just wrong. In any case, the main point is that the derivative is a welldefined mathematical object. If you compute the "derivative" and it isn't the same as the "old" definition, then whatever you have computed, it isn't the derivative. This is not a value judgement on your work, it's simply the definition. Last edited by skipjack; February 12th, 2019 at 05:18 AM. 
February 10th, 2019, 01:31 PM  #16 
Global Moderator Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada  The Forest City Posts: 7,943 Thanks: 1132 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond  A suggestion well worth taking. Thread closed.
Last edited by greg1313; February 10th, 2019 at 04:04 PM. 

Tags 
calculus, derivative, foundations, new mathematics 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Calculus Made Easy or A first course in calculus  Happy  Math Books  0  December 13th, 2014 03:20 AM 
Is is it possible to learn precalculus and calculus quickly?  KO1337  Academic Guidance  2  May 22nd, 2014 04:41 AM 
Which Calculus:A First Course in Calculus VS Thomas Calculus  pingpong  Math Books  0  August 13th, 2013 03:25 PM 
Calculus help  Bird  Calculus  3  February 19th, 2012 11:52 AM 
What precalculus needed for this calculus class?  tdod  Calculus  3  December 14th, 2011 11:24 AM 