January 16th, 2019, 09:03 AM  #1 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 124  Real numbers and decimals.
All real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences unrestricted in length. Convergence in the conventional sense has nothing to do with this. Addition and multiplication of two endless sequences is a problem because it starts from the right, but there are practical workarounds which satisfy all the requirements of science and engineering. If you replace decimal definition with abstract definitions, you regress to people living in caves with rulers who scratch symbols on the walls. Sequences: Example: 1352976....., .1352976...... 
January 16th, 2019, 09:05 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,306 Thanks: 549  
January 16th, 2019, 09:36 AM  #3 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 124  
January 16th, 2019, 09:46 AM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,157 Thanks: 631  
January 16th, 2019, 09:48 AM  #5  
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,306 Thanks: 549  Quote:
Your real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences unrestricted in length. OK. I have no interest in your real numbers.  
January 16th, 2019, 09:54 AM  #6 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2015 From: iPhone Posts: 387 Thanks: 61 
At least show one counterexample if possible. If not then prove it. Last edited by idontknow; January 16th, 2019 at 09:58 AM. 
January 16th, 2019, 09:57 AM  #7 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 124 
Maschke. Please give "Counter example" {whatever that means} JeffM1. Please give your definition of a real number and a representative member, other than "x" or "a." EDIT I wavered between "represented by" and "defined by". But what is it you are representing? A Dedekind cut? How do you define a Dedekind cut without numbers, and then what decimal do you assign to it? Last edited by skipjack; January 16th, 2019 at 02:57 PM. 
January 16th, 2019, 11:14 AM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,306 Thanks: 549 
A representative real number is 1. According to you it has a unique decimal representation. Prove it. You are the one trying to demonstrate something. I am under no obligation to do anything. I accept that you may define things as you please, but then what you have to say has no relevance to anyone else. 
January 16th, 2019, 11:29 AM  #9 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 124 
1 is a real number by definition: it is a unique decimal sequence. "No relevance to anyone else?" You mean to you, don't you? Last edited by skipjack; January 16th, 2019 at 02:58 PM. 
January 16th, 2019, 11:42 AM  #10 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,306 Thanks: 549  

Tags 
decimals, numbers, real 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Real Numbers and Natural Numbers  zylo  Topology  14  May 10th, 2017 02:57 AM 
Dimensions, and numbers beyond real numbers  Elektron  Math  4  May 7th, 2017 12:47 PM 
Real numbers  Congeniality  Math Books  2  June 10th, 2015 09:25 AM 
Irrational Numbers. Repeating Decimals and Infinity?  MattJ81  New Users  11  July 10th, 2010 08:51 PM 
Real Numbers  Tartarus  Algebra  2  November 26th, 2009 02:28 PM 