My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news


Thanks Tree37Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
January 16th, 2019, 09:03 AM   #1
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 124

Real numbers and decimals.

All real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences unrestricted in length. Convergence in the conventional sense has nothing to do with this.

Addition and multiplication of two endless sequences is a problem because it starts from the right, but there are practical work-arounds which satisfy all the requirements of science and engineering.

If you replace decimal definition with abstract definitions, you regress to people living in caves with rulers who scratch symbols on the walls.

Sequences: Example: 1352976....., .1352976......
zylo is offline  
 
January 16th, 2019, 09:05 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 549

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
All real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences unrestricted in length.
Prove it.
JeffM1 is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 09:36 AM   #3
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffM1 View Post
Prove it.
I said defined by.

What is your definition? Field? Give an example of a member of a field.
zylo is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 09:46 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 631

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
All real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences
That's not even true, with infinitely many obvious counterexamples.
Maschke is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 09:48 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 549

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
I said defined by.

What is your definition? Field? Give an example of a member of a field.
I agree. You can call things and define them how you want. But if you define things differently from other people, then your proofs do not apply to what other people are talking about.

Your real numbers can be defined by unique decimal sequences unrestricted in length. OK. I have no interest in your real numbers.
JeffM1 is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 09:54 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2015
From: iPhone

Posts: 387
Thanks: 61

At least show one counterexample if possible.
If not then prove it.

Last edited by idontknow; January 16th, 2019 at 09:58 AM.
idontknow is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 09:57 AM   #7
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 124

Maschke. Please give "Counter example" {whatever that means}

JeffM1. Please give your definition of a real number and a representative member, other than "x" or "a."

EDIT

I wavered between "represented by" and "defined by". But what is it you are representing? A Dedekind cut? How do you define a Dedekind cut without numbers, and then what decimal do you assign to it?

Last edited by skipjack; January 16th, 2019 at 02:57 PM.
zylo is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 11:14 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 549

A representative real number is 1. According to you it has a unique decimal representation. Prove it.

You are the one trying to demonstrate something. I am under no obligation to do anything. I accept that you may define things as you please, but then what you have to say has no relevance to anyone else.
Thanks from topsquark
JeffM1 is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 11:29 AM   #9
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 124

1 is a real number by definition: it is a unique decimal sequence.

"No relevance to anyone else?" You mean to you, don't you?

Last edited by skipjack; January 16th, 2019 at 02:58 PM.
zylo is offline  
January 16th, 2019, 11:42 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 549

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
1 is a real number by definition: it is a unique decimal sequence.
That is exactly what you must prove, or you are just talking to yourself.
JeffM1 is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Tags
decimals, numbers, real



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real Numbers and Natural Numbers zylo Topology 14 May 10th, 2017 02:57 AM
Dimensions, and numbers beyond real numbers Elektron Math 4 May 7th, 2017 12:47 PM
Real numbers Congeniality Math Books 2 June 10th, 2015 09:25 AM
Irrational Numbers. Repeating Decimals and Infinity? MattJ81 New Users 11 July 10th, 2010 08:51 PM
Real Numbers Tartarus Algebra 2 November 26th, 2009 02:28 PM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.