My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news

Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
October 4th, 2018, 10:42 AM   #1
Banned Camp
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 126

Cantor's Diagonal Argument is Wrong

This is a slight refinement (simplification and condensation) of my previous expositions which evolved in the quoted thread. I put it here because it was being buried, and because it addresses the subject directly.

Originally Posted by zylo View Post
List of binary and decimal representation of ALL The Natural and Real [0,1) Numbers:


1) The list is endless and contains ALL imaginable strings of binary and decimal digits.
2) Adding a radix point before the binaries and after the natural numbers gives all real numbers in [0,1) in binary and decimal form.
5000 becomes 5000., or more commonly, .0005

Like all great ideas, it is beautifully simple, transparent, foundational, and can be understood by almost everyone, making it part of the world's cultural heritage.
zylo is offline  
October 4th, 2018, 10:46 AM   #2
Global Moderator
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 21,026
Thanks: 2257

As I stated before, it's unclear and incorrect.
skipjack is offline  
October 4th, 2018, 10:51 AM   #3
Math Team
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,690
Thanks: 2669

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
I thought we'd agreed to close down this sort of idiocy.
v8archie is offline  
October 4th, 2018, 11:04 AM   #4
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 552

Originally Posted by skipjack View Post
As I stated before, it's unclear and incorrect.
It is also irrelevant. No one, particularly not Cantor, said that you could not represent all the natural numbers by an infinite list of infinite bit strings. What he proved was that, if you accept the idea of infinite strings and infinite lists at all, any infinite list that can be placed in one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers will be incomplete.

Zylo's intuition is that this idea is ridiculous. Consequently, he assumes that such a list is complete. But an assumption is not a proof. He does everything in the world except address Cantor's argument.

There are two plausible responses to Cantor. One is to reject the idea that the infinite "exists" and therefore to adopt the position that theorems about infinity have the same epistemological status as theorems about the psychology of werewolves. The other is to accept that, at least in the human imagination, the infinite exists but follows rules that are completely alien to human intuition.
JeffM1 is offline  
October 4th, 2018, 11:05 AM   #5
Global Moderator
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 21,026
Thanks: 2257

We don't need this as a separate thread for the time being, so I've closed it. I might ultimately reopen it by transferring all the related posts from the other thread.
skipjack is offline  
Closed Thread

  My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

argument, cantor, diagonal, wrong

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cantor's Diagonal Argument zylo Real Analysis 1 March 9th, 2018 08:34 AM
Summary of Cantor's Diagonal Argument is Wrong zylo Topology 22 April 11th, 2016 09:22 AM
Cantor's Diagonal Argument zylo Math 22 January 26th, 2016 08:05 PM
Help! Cantor's Diagonal Argument mjcguest Applied Math 9 July 25th, 2013 07:22 AM
Cantorīs diagonal argument netzweltler Applied Math 191 November 7th, 2010 01:39 PM

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.