My Math Forum > Math trouble with multiplication

 Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news

 October 1st, 2018, 08:19 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Oct 2018 From: here Posts: 1 Thanks: 0 trouble with multiplication I have found a flaw (I'm sure I'm not the ONLY one). Now in my understanding of math is of < or > or = to etc. etc. and I also realize the difference to physical proof to theoretical proof from what math seems to be based on (in my opinion). Also to be considered is that Occam's razor DOES NOT always work. Why? Because of Murphy's law. (Do you know this??) So knowing things go wrong while accepting the simplest answer it tells me that SOMETHING is wrong! I know this sounds like wacky mumbo jumbo, but well it's the nature of the beast, so to speak. Anyways.... 0x5=? 0? right 5x0=? 0? right? I say wrong, and I have PHYSICAL proof. I know this will get some flack, but I'll let this sit here so people can see it. PLEASE don't be shy and let's get to the bottom of this. I am very serious and this is NO WAY an attempt to insult anyone! I just want my windows OS to work flawlessly and until we get all the CONTRADICTIONS in mathematics it will never be flawless. Thank you for making it through this spiel and look forward to any and all sides of criticism. Last edited by skipjack; October 1st, 2018 at 10:32 PM.
 October 1st, 2018, 10:37 PM #2 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,921 Thanks: 2203 Google suggests 0 for 5x0, but not for 0x5.
 October 2nd, 2018, 12:56 PM #3 Global Moderator   Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,806 Thanks: 716 Since when is multiplication not commutative?
 October 2nd, 2018, 01:40 PM #4 Math Team   Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 14,597 Thanks: 1038 What d'heck going on? Is x a multiplication symbol? If so, why? Google gives 0 for both 5*0 and 0*5. Also, google treats 0x5 as an error code.
October 2nd, 2018, 02:16 PM   #5
Global Moderator

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,921
Thanks: 2203

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mathman Since when is multiplication not commutative?
When using octonions, for example.

 October 2nd, 2018, 02:52 PM #6 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 850 Thanks: 325 Is there supposed to be any proof or evidence in your OP? I must have missed that. Thanks from JeffM1
October 2nd, 2018, 02:56 PM   #7
Senior Member

Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 551

Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack When using octonions, for example.
And there you go.

But I am still waiting for the "physical" proof that $a * 0 \ne 0 * a.$

October 2nd, 2018, 03:01 PM   #8
Math Team

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 14,597
Thanks: 1038

Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack When using octonions, for example.
Onions grown in October....for your BigMac...?

October 2nd, 2018, 03:02 PM   #9
Senior Member

Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 551

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Micrm@ss Is there supposed to be any proof or evidence in your OP? I must have missed that.
No, you missed nothing. There WAS an assertion that a "physical proof" existed, but the OP overlooked supplying evidence for that assertion. I am confident that the oversight will be corrected at any moment.

October 2nd, 2018, 04:50 PM   #10
Global Moderator

Joined: Oct 2008
From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City

Posts: 7,958
Thanks: 1146

Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond
Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack Google suggests 0 for 5x0, but not for 0x5.
That looks like notation for a hexadecimal number.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Drake Elementary Math 6 August 5th, 2013 06:16 AM gazing600000 Algebra 14 January 27th, 2013 11:35 AM tallbabe1 Algebra 1 January 27th, 2013 11:17 AM Adrian Algebra 4 February 5th, 2012 01:00 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top