My Math Forum > Math Proof of Riemann Hypothesis
 User Name Remember Me? Password

 Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news

 September 21st, 2018, 04:55 PM #11 Global Moderator     Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City Posts: 7,935 Thanks: 1129 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond Haha...missed it on the first scan... - pretty sparse article. Thanks from Joppy
September 21st, 2018, 05:18 PM   #12
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2017
From: United Kingdom

Posts: 312
Thanks: 111

Math Focus: Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Joppy I didn't have much luck trying to find these 'remarkable claims'. Anyone know what this is referring to?
In the past couple of years, he's given a proof that $S^6$ admits no complex structure, and a very short proof of Feit-Thompson. The consensus seems to be that neither attempt holds up.

 September 22nd, 2018, 06:42 AM #13 Banned Camp   Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 125 A required format for presentations of this magnitude and significance should be that ALL Axioms, A1,A2..., definitions, D1,D2,.... , and assumed Theorems T1,T2.. be listed first, and every deduction refer to them. Deductions would also be listed throughout the paper P1,P2,P3,.. and subsequent deductions would reference previous deductions where relevant. These would also appear at the beginning in the form, for example: P1, D3, A5, T2 ............ P10, D5, A3, P7 P11, P3 P12, D2,D7,T4,T10 ................ In this way a proof schema would be established for the entire paper which could be systematically checked by numerous people, and points of disagreement could be identified and adjudicated. Such a proof schema is known as zylo's proof schema.
September 22nd, 2018, 06:51 AM   #14
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 784
Thanks: 280

Quote:
 Originally Posted by zylo such a proof schema is known as zylo's proof schema.
lol

 September 22nd, 2018, 07:49 AM #15 Banned Camp   Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 125 If I were editor of a math journal, I wouldn't accept a paper, much less read one, not in zylo's format (proof schema).
September 22nd, 2018, 07:53 AM   #16
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,659
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 Originally Posted by zylo Such a proof schema is known as zylo's proof schema.
There's two ways of looking at this:
1. this is how papers are written, with most papers basically saying "we start from where $x$ and $y$ left off"; or
2. almost nobody would be able to write any paper at all because of the difficulty and verbosity of starting from ZFC and getting to, for example, Cálculus.

 September 23rd, 2018, 03:06 PM #17 Senior Member   Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,801 Thanks: 636 Math Focus: Yet to find out. Looks like the event will be streamed live on the Heidelberg forum site: https://www.heidelberg-laureate-forum.org/event_2018/, in case anyone wants to watch.. Thanks from greg1313
 September 23rd, 2018, 03:49 PM #18 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,636 Thanks: 2081 I wonder what odds are available on a flaw being spotted on the same day as the talk.
September 23rd, 2018, 07:27 PM   #19
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2016
From: Australia

Posts: 1,801
Thanks: 636

Math Focus: Yet to find out.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack I wonder what odds are available on a flaw being spotted on the same day as the talk.
What do you think?

 September 24th, 2018, 03:22 AM #20 Newbie   Joined: Sep 2018 From: Russia Posts: 1 Thanks: 0 Dr. I proved RH more that year ago, it is in my arxiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03827 up to some corrections in calculus ((almost) final version appear tomorrow) it is right proof. I proved the convexity of the square of modulus of zeta function on critical trip. Mr Atiyah many times appear in the in the pictures google search "Blinovsky proved Riemann hypothesis". What will be next - if his proof is wrong (I dot check it) - nothing - if it is also valid - started philosophy that Newton stands on the shoulder of Gians, or something else. Even if I "win", I will not be O, but I will be happy to live next 25 years with my wife Blinovsky Vladimir

 Tags hypothesis, proof, riemann

Search tags for this page
,
,

# atiyah riemann hypothesis is a crank

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post jlb Number Theory 1 January 15th, 2015 12:49 PM Vincenzo Oliva Number Theory 12 November 27th, 2014 03:14 PM mathbalarka Number Theory 0 October 31st, 2013 12:54 AM eddybob123 Number Theory 18 May 21st, 2013 06:10 PM joexian Number Theory 5 January 16th, 2013 06:13 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.