June 17th, 2017, 02:31 PM  #11 
Newbie Joined: Jun 2017 From: Albuquerque, USA Posts: 12 Thanks: 0 
This equation represents the point at which existence is achieving property through kinetic energy realization of existence (first equation, through the kinetic energy/power relation, see energy power). The second equation is more like describing how to fill in an empty set with value where the access point to each set is where id access is pointing in each recursion. Both are recursive equations describing a fractal of property values being set. The recursion point is after one equation solution, property value gains setting property but at the same point setting property can gain additional potential for property on the outside or inside by going through a gamma identity or zeta identity respectively at the point of recursion. It's an important middle man in regards to the zeta/gamma identity. It represents transference of value in an operational system. It's what describes the identities on the inside of the set as the set itself. Hyperstate/ID access zeta trigonometry is required to point in at value selection. Relative gamma identity is relative open set identity. It's where description of the identity between the inside and outside endpoints lie. Also, more basically, this equation is how to describe the properties of identity itself. It has no direct relation to infinity, but along the line of potential for change transference over the boundlessness range it describes how identity with in a set and set identity can meet. It applies to all sets. Counts of proof, making the OP true. Last edited by kirving; June 17th, 2017 at 02:47 PM. 
June 17th, 2017, 04:40 PM  #12 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,029 Thanks: 420 
I am using this the next time I make a real estate investment.

June 17th, 2017, 06:56 PM  #13 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2014 From: USA Posts: 363 Thanks: 26 
I think I see one small error. I don't know for sure though... I can't quite put my finger on it. Maybe it's just me, but I think I'm not on drugs. Is that going to be a problem for this?


Tags 
boundlessness, infinity 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Infinity  Microlab  Math  61  May 29th, 2017 07:36 PM 
Infinity (?)  kfarnan  Calculus  3  August 29th, 2011 10:47 AM 
Infinity.  deanmullen10  Applied Math  10  July 30th, 2010 01:18 AM 
Solve X where infinity>x>infinity  DQ  Algebra  5  September 14th, 2009 05:13 AM 
infinity  fibonaccilover  Applied Math  9  July 26th, 2009 08:07 PM 