My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

Math General Math Forum - For general math related discussion and news

View Poll Results: Is x/0 infinitesimal?
Yes! Completely agree! 0 0%
Possibly agree... 0 0%
Don't agree. 2 100.00%
I have proof against it. 0 0%
I don't know. 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll

Thanks Tree4Thanks
  • 2 Post By Azzajazz
  • 1 Post By Benit13
  • 1 Post By v8archie
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
January 28th, 2016, 08:47 PM   #1
Joined: Jan 2016
From: Canada

Posts: 2
Thanks: 0

Lightbulb Dividing by Zero Theories

I recently watched a numberphile video on youtube about the problems with zero, and it got my thinking. Looking at the linguistics, dividing means putting into a given number of groups, and if you have zero groups, then every -For lack of a better term- 'piece' would be by itself, and each piece would be infinitesimally small. So by that thinking, x/0=0.000...01, but since you cant write that, in a finite space, we would need a new symbol for it.
Chichenwin is offline  
January 28th, 2016, 08:53 PM   #2
Joined: Jan 2016
From: Canada

Posts: 2
Thanks: 0

Question Please share your opinion!

I'm only in grade 9, and don't know much about this stuff, so if anyone more experienced is completely facepalming right now, please don't hate, explain it to me.
And use simple language

Last edited by Chichenwin; January 28th, 2016 at 08:58 PM. Reason: Afterthought
Chichenwin is offline  
January 28th, 2016, 09:45 PM   #3
Math Team
Joined: Nov 2014
From: Australia

Posts: 689
Thanks: 244

Below is the graph of $y = \dfrac{a}{x}$. Can you see what happens near $x = 0$?
The right side of the graph shoots up towards infinity and the left side of the graph shoots down towards negative infinity. That's certainly not infinitesimal.

Thanks from 123qwerty and topsquark
Azzajazz is offline  
January 29th, 2016, 12:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2014
From: Glasgow

Posts: 2,155
Thanks: 731

Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions
Another fun case is:

$\displaystyle y = \frac{\sin x}{x}$ as x gets closer and closer to 0 (i.e. closer and closer towards 0/0). Here's a plot of the function:

y = 1 at x = 0!

The function above is well known and is called sinc x. Weird no?

The point of this is that the divide by zero operation really does give weird behaviour... all functions that have a possible divide by zero in it, such as $\displaystyle y = \frac{a}{x}$ and $\displaystyle y = \frac{\sin x}{x}$ could have different behaviours as the divisor gets closer and closer to zero.

So what do you do to get around this? In practise what you would do is look to $\displaystyle limit theory$ and evaluate the limit of the function as the dividend tends to 0.
Thanks from topsquark
Benit13 is offline  
January 29th, 2016, 05:08 AM   #5
Math Team
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,657
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
On a technical note $y={\sin x \over x}$ does not have $y(0)=1$. Instead $y(0)$ is undefined - it has no value. This is precisely because the operation of dividing by zero is not well defined.

On a more general mathematical note: mathematical results are not a matter of opinion determined by the result of a poll. A statement is either true, false or undecidable. Sometimes you can get different results in different mathematical systems, but no one mathematical system is more true than any other: each is simply a product of the axioms and definitions that underpin it. Some systems are considered more standard than others, and if you don't specify a particular system, most people will assume you mean one of those.
Thanks from topsquark

Last edited by v8archie; January 29th, 2016 at 05:23 AM.
v8archie is offline  
February 2nd, 2016, 03:53 AM   #6
Joined: Oct 2014
From: UK

Posts: 62
Thanks: 2

To me, the many problems with zero are an indication of serious flaws with the fundamentals of mathematics.

It is stated that zero has no multiplicative inverse and this is used as an excuse to treat zero differently to all other numbers.

Divide by zero is just one of many zero-related problems. Another obvious one is the belief that zero times anything equals zero. If I have zero apples this is not the same as there being zero universes, but I can equate these two because they both supposedly equal 0.

I have also read that zero to the power zero can supposedly have different values in different situations.

In base 10 there are lots of division operations that are problematic, not just divide by zero. A simple example is 1 divided by 3. The problem is that the division algorithm (for long/short division) has no defined way it can end, it cannot complete. It is a huge cop-out to avoid the issue by calling it a ratio, or to simply assert that using the words ‘infinitely many’ will somehow mysteriously cause it to finish.

To solve problems like divide 1 by 3, I produced my own algorithm for division in any given base where an end point is always achieved. My new algorithm works for any integer values, including divide by zero. For example, it evaluates 0 divided by 0 to be 1, which just happens to support the argument that sin(x)/x = 1 at x=0 (as opposed to being undefined).

Sometime soon I hope to write a blog article on this subject at Extreme Finitism.

The introduction of complex numbers made many problems solvable which were previously not solvable using algebra. The treatment of zero should have a similarly elegant solution; it should not involve lots of annoying rules that say what we can and cannot do when rearranging algebraic expressions to avoid hitting problems with zero.

My response to the OP is that the question makes no sense because I do not accept ‘infinitesimal’ to be well defined.

Last edited by Karma Peny; February 2nd, 2016 at 04:32 AM.
Karma Peny is offline  
February 2nd, 2016, 04:25 AM   #7
Math Team
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,657
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Originally Posted by Karma Peny View Post
To me, the many problems with zero are an indication of serious flaws with the fundamentals of mathematics.
This is clearly because you don't understand much mathematics and are too lazy to learn it properly and accept what the results show. Instead you prefer to waste your time pretending that what you don't understand must be wrong.

Most of what you wrote is either wrong or right, but not for the reasons you give.
v8archie is offline  

  My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math

dividing, problem, question, theories, unsolved

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dividing by 0 afk Algebra 3 December 26th, 2014 09:18 PM
1st order theories outsos Physics 7 April 25th, 2014 03:05 AM
Books/articles about applications of some theories honzik Math Books 0 February 8th, 2013 12:29 PM
Theories Involved - A phenomena of weight lifting rnck Physics 0 December 22nd, 2012 10:05 PM
Axiomatic theories Zombi Applied Math 3 April 3rd, 2010 05:25 PM

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.