My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math Events

Math Events Math Events, Competitions, Meetups - Local, Regional, State, National, International


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
January 20th, 2012, 03:42 PM   #1
Math Team
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Greece, Thessaloniki

Posts: 1,961
Thanks: 117

Math Focus: pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre calculus
Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

[color=#000000]Define a relation * on , such that which satisfies the associative property. Compute



.[/color]
ZardoZ is offline  
 
January 20th, 2012, 04:09 PM   #2
 
Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 245
Thanks: 0

Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

I don't think this question is entirely clear.

Is this to be taken to mean:


Where:
(Implying that the 2nd two is just a typo?)

Or are you going for some wicked sequence that goes like this:



where each number is repeated its own amount of times?

I presume that's not the case, as that'd be on the scale of a Euler problem from project Euler. xD

Edit: Offtopic, but you might be interested in this: http://projecteuler.net/ It is primarily computer-esque and programmer-friendly problems, but they are quite interesting.
CherryPi is offline  
January 20th, 2012, 06:20 PM   #3
 
Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 245
Thanks: 0

Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

Okay, so I know that * is commutative as well:



OMG, I just made an awesome result:

Define the following operator such that:


This follows cleverly from the definition of *:



You can get a quick answer to the original problem by making the various substitutions:



W|A can evaluate that product: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5 ... 7D%7D-3%29

So,

Wow, my number sense is retarded. I just realized that the product is 0 because at , the product produces a 0. From that point on, it is forever 0. Hence the above result.

edit: This is all assuming you made a typo.
CherryPi is offline  
January 20th, 2012, 06:48 PM   #4
Math Team
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Greece, Thessaloniki

Posts: 1,961
Thanks: 117

Math Focus: pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre pre calculus
Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryPi
Okay, so I know that * is commutative as well:



OMG, I just made an awesome result:

Define the following operator such that:


This follows cleverly from the definition of *:



You can get a quick answer to the original problem by making the various substitutions:



W|A can evaluate that product: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5 ... 7D%7D-3%29

So,

Wow, my number sense is retarded. I just realized that the product is 0 because at , the product produces a 0. From that point on, it is forever 0. Hence the above result.

edit: This is all assuming you made a typo.
[color=#000000]
In some parts I can't follow you.

Hint: use the fact that for all .[/color]
ZardoZ is offline  
January 21st, 2012, 06:52 AM   #5
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Belgium

Posts: 522
Thanks: 0

Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

The reasoning of CherryPi was correct. Here the solution using the hint.


wnvl is offline  
January 21st, 2012, 10:56 AM   #6
 
Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 245
Thanks: 0

Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZardoZ
In some parts I can't follow you.
It just relies on looking at what the operation * does.

When you perform the operation times, you result in a product with just a 3 on the outside. That's what I meant here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CherryPi

This follows cleverly from the definition of *:

Look closely: You can see that

It's just a pattern that follows from the operation's definition. (The "ad infinitum" part was particularly important. It meant that, if you kept doing this process over and over, you'd get the precise result involving the product and the addition of the 3 on the outside. It was also me being a bit lazy. :P Pardon me.)
CherryPi is offline  
January 21st, 2012, 03:13 PM   #7
Global Moderator
 
greg1313's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City

Posts: 6,093
Thanks: 312

Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond
Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

That's pretty good, CherryPi. I won't say I understand it in fine detail, but I think I do get the general idea, which is more than what I had when I first read the topic.
greg1313 is online now  
January 21st, 2012, 04:06 PM   #8
 
Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 245
Thanks: 0

Re: Romanian Baccalaoureat-Question

Thanks, Greg. I think it was easier to solve this generally, but it was kinda unilluminating until I actually related the general solution back to the problem.
CherryPi is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > Math Forums > Math Events

Tags
baccalaoureatquestion, romanian



Thread Tools
Display Modes






Copyright © 2014 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.