
Linear Algebra Linear Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
December 6th, 2018, 07:15 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Nov 2016 From: Aus Posts: 24 Thanks: 0  Check, for constructing nice set of linear equations
Hi Well, I was struggling with solving these linear equations for days. more accurately, It solved but the answers do not check with what I have, so want to find where I have mistaken. It would be appreciated if you can check with me that my understanding is correct for the problem. (do not lose the interest please, it is nice math, promise you) 1 the equations are : Aij*fj + Bij*gj =S1. S0j (1) Cij*fj + Dij*gj =S2. S0j(2) i,j=0,1,2,3.............N fj,&gj are variables f0,f1,fN; g0,g1gN The constants are: A,B,C,D, (vary for i,&j) see attached, please. S1, S2 (are not depending on i&j): they are constants with one value for each Sij = Kroencker delta (=1, when i=j, & =0:if i≠j ) I used, Sij = zero matrix with diagonal elements = 1 I used, S0j= zero when j≠0, else S0j=1 the details of the constants calculation (depend on i,& j) are in the attached 2My questions: are the equations in a matrix form, or not? what do I mean, here? well, if the equations are in a matrix form then the equations will be like [ row (i) from A * column vector of, f, Plus row (i) from B * column vector of g = S1.S0j], then the number of equations is 2*(N+1) ..(2 for 2 sets of equations, and (+1) to account the N=0, the number of variables in each equation is 2*(N+1) But what about (S0j) as each equation, in this case, has all (j) values!. there is a mistake here, right? So the other option which seems more reasonable based on the presented equations and was tried but no success in the results is for each (i, j) there is one equation: i.e.; A01*f1+B01*g1=(s1*0; as j≠0, so S0j=0), then, (A01*f1+B01*g1=0) This will end a number of equations = 2*(N+1)^2 many of these equations are zeros in the matrix of equations the number of varibales= 2*(N+1) As the number of equations > a number of variables, lease square method used to minimize the square of error in each equation). This will end up with a number of equation = number of variables can be solved linearly. But, in this case, as you clearly can see (trying an example of N=2) The values of ( fj, & gj =0 for j≠0 !!). and then the solutions are always for f0, g0 only. I feel there is a mistake here, as increasing the terms N (then the number of variables) should enhance/convergence the results Your comment & suggestion would be of great help Please see the attached Thanks 

Tags 
check, constructing, equations, linear, nice, set 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
EigenValues and differential equations.. Please check my math  zollen  Linear Algebra  1  February 18th, 2018 12:14 PM 
Constructing Mathematical Equations  oroman1026  Academic Guidance  2  March 11th, 2016 06:14 PM 
Linear Equations  CoolGuyNice  Algebra  3  March 4th, 2015 01:54 AM 
Can anybody check my answers (linear algebra)?  Artus  Linear Algebra  0  October 13th, 2012 11:48 AM 
Two Linear Equations  kimmi23  Algebra  2  July 20th, 2012 04:28 AM 