September 25th, 2018, 07:30 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2018 From: UK Posts: 103 Thanks: 1  Is the Is definition of a ‘point’ in geometry contradictory?
“A point is defined only by some properties, called axioms, that it must satisfy. In particular, the geometric points do not have any length, area, volume or any other dimensional attribute” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_(geometry) If a point has no length it does not exist so the definition is surely logically contradictory? The definition of point in maths leads to confusion. For example:  people talk about an actually infinite number of points on a line segment  But point must has length > 0 else it does not exist.  With this revised definition of a point the number of points on any line segment is always a finite number rather than Actual Infinity. 
September 25th, 2018, 07:40 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 784 Thanks: 280 
Cool. So how do you define length? 
September 25th, 2018, 07:46 AM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2018 From: UK Posts: 103 Thanks: 1 
By length, I mean the a point cannot exist as a 0 dimensional object (that is another contradiction). So the point must have dimensions, one of which I’ve labelled ‘length’. So length might be equivalent to the x dimension of Cartesian space.

September 25th, 2018, 07:52 AM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 784 Thanks: 280  Please give a rigorous axiom system or definition or anything, that allows you to say what you mean with length.

September 25th, 2018, 07:57 AM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2018 From: UK Posts: 103 Thanks: 1  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length “length is the most extended dimension of an object.[1] In the International System of Quantities, length is any quantity with dimension distance” 
September 25th, 2018, 08:01 AM  #6  
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 784 Thanks: 280  Quote:
 
September 25th, 2018, 08:04 AM  #7 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2018 From: UK Posts: 103 Thanks: 1 
Well how would you define length then?

September 25th, 2018, 08:06 AM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 784 Thanks: 280  Read a geometry book. For a rigorous treatment defining length from scratch, read Moise, "Elementary geometry from an advanced standpoint". That provides into to the two most treated geometries, Birkhoffs system, and Hilbert's system. Once you digested that, come back and discuss this again. 
September 25th, 2018, 08:07 AM  #9 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,654 Thanks: 2087  
September 25th, 2018, 08:16 AM  #10 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 784 Thanks: 280 
Hey dude, if you want to model the earth rotating around the sun without taking the simplification that the earth is a point without length and with therefore taking into account the entire rigid body dynamics involved, go right ahead, not going to stop you.


Tags 
‘point’, contradictory, definition, geometry 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Two 3D Trigo Geometry Problems without using vector or coordinate geometry  whsvin  Geometry  0  February 1st, 2017 07:07 AM 
Contradictory Derivative  vamosromil  Calculus  9  October 18th, 2012 11:25 AM 
Seemingly contradictory  Dart Plegius  Algebra  2  June 19th, 2012 12:24 PM 
Fun contradictory(?) problem  Aqil  Applied Math  6  November 25th, 2011 09:21 PM 
Algebraic Geometry Definition Question  xianghu324  Abstract Algebra  1  August 8th, 2010 08:37 AM 