
Geometry Geometry Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
August 17th, 2018, 05:08 AM  #1 
Member Joined: Jan 2018 From: Belgrade Posts: 54 Thanks: 2  Prove that P, Q and R are collinear
Straight line $\displaystyle p$ contains orthocenter $\displaystyle H$ of the acute triangle $\displaystyle ABC$ and intersects its edges $\displaystyle AB$ and $\displaystyle CA$, and edge $\displaystyle CA$ at point $\displaystyle P$. Straight line $\displaystyle q$ perpendicular to $\displaystyle p$ contains point $\displaystyle H$ also, intersects edges $\displaystyle AB$ and $\displaystyle BC$, and edge $\displaystyle BC$ at point $\displaystyle Q$. Straight line through $\displaystyle A$ parallel to $\displaystyle q$, and staight line through $\displaystyle B$ parallel to $\displaystyle p$ intersect at point $\displaystyle R$. Prove that points $\displaystyle P$, $\displaystyle Q$ and $\displaystyle R$ are collinear.

September 14th, 2018, 01:34 PM  #2 
Member Joined: Jan 2018 From: Belgrade Posts: 54 Thanks: 2 
I tried to make some progress. See the picture. We can write: $\displaystyle DH=RE$, and $\displaystyle RD=HE$. $\displaystyle PH=RE+PD$ $\displaystyle QH=QE+RD$ After squaring the two above equations, we get: $\displaystyle PH^{2}=RE^{2}+2\cdot RE\cdot PD + PD^{2}$ and $\displaystyle QH^{2}=QE^{2}+2\cdot QE\cdot RD + RD^{2}$. After the addition of two previous equations, we get: $\displaystyle PH^{2}+QH^{2}=RE^{2}+QE^{2}+PD^{2}+RD^{2}+2\cdot(R E\cdot PD + QE\cdot RD)$ Since $\displaystyle RE^{2}+QE^{2}=RQ^{2}$ and $\displaystyle PD^{2}+RD^{2}=PR^{2}$, we have: $\displaystyle PH^{2}+QH^{2}=RQ^{2}+PR^{2}+2\cdot(RE\cdot PD + QE\cdot RD)$, i.e: $\displaystyle PH^{2}+QH^{2}=(RQ+PR)^{2}2\cdot PR\cdot RQ+2\cdot(RE\cdot PD + QE\cdot RD)$. If points $\displaystyle P$, $\displaystyle R$ and $\displaystyle Q$ are collinear, we would have: $\displaystyle PH^{2}+QH^{2}=PQ^{2}$. So, that $\displaystyle P$, $\displaystyle Q$ and $\displaystyle R$ would be collinear, we have to prove that $\displaystyle PR\cdot RQ= RE\cdot PD + QE\cdot RD$. Here I stuck. 
September 14th, 2018, 02:00 PM  #3 
Member Joined: Jan 2018 From: Belgrade Posts: 54 Thanks: 2 
When I look better, last equation seems to be the same as $\displaystyle \cos^{2}\alpha + \sin^{2}\alpha =1$ (when the equation is divided by $\displaystyle PR\cdot RQ$), where $\displaystyle \alpha =\angle PRD$ which is equal to $\displaystyle \angle RQH$, when $\displaystyle P$, $\displaystyle R$ and $\displaystyle Q$ are collinear. In this moment, I'm feeling like I'm running my own tail. Last edited by skipjack; October 26th, 2018 at 08:09 AM. 
October 26th, 2018, 12:15 AM  #4 
Member Joined: Jan 2018 From: Belgrade Posts: 54 Thanks: 2 
I managed to solve this problem ''with a little help from my friends''. Problem can be solved analytically, taking coordinates: $\displaystyle A(a,b), B(0,0)$ and $\displaystyle C(1,0)$. If someone is interested, I can write complete proof. 
October 26th, 2018, 08:22 AM  #5 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,877 Thanks: 1834 
I'm interested. My gut feeling was that this problem had more to do with angles than with Pythagoras.

October 29th, 2018, 03:19 AM  #6 
Member Joined: Jan 2018 From: Belgrade Posts: 54 Thanks: 2 
Equation of line AB is: $\displaystyle y_{AB}(x)=\frac{b}{a}x$, with note that besides $\displaystyle 0<a<1$, it is true that $\displaystyle b>\sqrt{a(1a)}$, i.e. point $\displaystyle A$ must be above the semicircle over the diameter $\displaystyle BC$ for $\displaystyle a$ given. Line $\displaystyle HC$ is perpendicular to line $\displaystyle AB$, so its equation is: $\displaystyle y_{HC}(x)=\frac{a}{b}(1x)$ from where it follows that the coordinates of the point $\displaystyle H$ are: $\displaystyle H(a, \frac{a}{b}(1a)) $. If slope of the line $\displaystyle p$ is $\displaystyle k$, then equations of lines $\displaystyle p$ and $\displaystyle q$ are: $\displaystyle y_{PH}(x)=k(xa)+\frac{a}{b}(1a)$ and $\displaystyle y_{PH}(x)=\frac{1}{k}(xa)+\frac{a}{b}(1a)$, respectively, where $\displaystyle \frac{a}{b}<k<\frac{a}{b}+\frac{1}{b}$. Equations of lines $\displaystyle AC$ and $\displaystyle BC$ are: $\displaystyle y_{AC}(x)=\frac{b}{1a}(1x)$ and $\displaystyle y_{BC}(x)=0$, respectively. From equation $\displaystyle y_{PH}(x_{P})=y_{AC}(x_{P})$ we get point $\displaystyle P$ coordinates: $\displaystyle x_{P}=\frac{b^{2}+a(1a)(bk(1a))}{b(b+(1a)k)}$, $\displaystyle y_{P}=\frac{(1a)(a+bk)}{b+(1a)k}$. From equation $\displaystyle y_{QH}(x_{Q})=y_{BC}(x_{Q})$ we get point $\displaystyle Q$ coordinates: $\displaystyle x_{Q}=\frac{a}{b}(b+(1a)k)$ and $\displaystyle y_{Q}=0$. Equations of lines $\displaystyle RB$ and $\displaystyle RA$ are: $\displaystyle y_{RB}(x)=kx$ and $\displaystyle y_{RA}(x)=\frac{1}{k}(xa)+b$, respectively. From equation $\displaystyle y_{RB}(x_{R})=y_{RA}(x_{R})$ we get point $\displaystyle R$ coordinates: $\displaystyle x_{R}=\frac{a+bk}{k^{2}+1}$ and $\displaystyle y_{R}=\frac{k}{k^{2}+1}(a+bk)$. Now, equation of the line $\displaystyle RQ$ is $\displaystyle y_{RQ}(x)=\frac{y_{R}}{x_{R}x_{Q}}(xx_{Q})$. If the coordinates of point $\displaystyle P$ satisfy this equation, then points $\displaystyle P$, $\displaystyle Q$ and $\displaystyle R$ are collinear. Indeed, after a little calculation, it can be shown that $\displaystyle y_{RQ}(x_{P})=y_{P}$, what should have been proved. Sorry for waiting. P.S. Few days ago I found another proof using right triangles similarity. I'll post it too, if you're interested. Last edited by lua; October 29th, 2018 at 03:24 AM. 
October 31st, 2018, 08:30 AM  #7  
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2010 Posts: 697 Thanks: 135  Quote:
Then we get $\displaystyle H(0,bc/a)$. From this we get lines p and q as $\displaystyle y=mx+bc/a$ and $\displaystyle y=x/m+bc/a$. Line p intersects $\displaystyle AC$ at $\displaystyle P \left(\dfrac{a^2cbc^2}{a^2+amc},\dfrac{amc+bc}{a+mc} \right)$. Line q intersects $\displaystyle BC$ at $\displaystyle Q \left(\dfrac{mbc}{a},0 \right)$. The lines through $\displaystyle A$ parallel to q and through $\displaystyle B$ parallel to p intersect at $\displaystyle R \left(\dfrac{ambm^2}{1+m^2},\dfrac{am^2+mb}{1+m^2} \right)$. Now calculate the slope of $\displaystyle PQ$ and the slope of $\displaystyle QR$. They both come out $\displaystyle \dfrac{a^2m+ab}{a^2ambbcbcm^2}$ Therefore $\displaystyle P,Q,R$ are collinear points. I've got to believe that there is a slightly less ugly solution!  

Tags 
collinear, prove 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
collinear points and curves.  gelatine1  Algebra  15  August 26th, 2013 06:17 AM 
Help please \ noncollinear points  Tooomy  Algebra  1  December 28th, 2010 03:55 PM 
three collinear points in a Cyclic quadrilateral  liaofei1128  Algebra  0  April 1st, 2010 11:18 PM 
prove prove prove. currently dont know where to post  qweiop90  Algebra  1  July 31st, 2008 07:27 AM 
Collinear complex's  Mazaheri  Complex Analysis  9  March 6th, 2007 09:22 AM 