Elementary Math Fractions, Percentages, Word Problems, Equations, Inequations, Factorization, Expansion

 May 1st, 2014, 08:21 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0 impossible task See the attached pdf and you will clearly https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1
May 1st, 2014, 11:08 AM   #2
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,393
Thanks: 749

Quote:
 Originally Posted by msbiljanica See the attached pdf and you will clearly https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1
I am afraid I did not read past your abstract, in which you claim to have solved the ancient Greek problems of squaring the circle, doubling the cube, and trisecting an arbitrary angle ... with straightedge and compass.

Since it's well established by modern math that these problems cannot be solved, it's impossible that you've solved them. Rather, you've either made a mistake or misunderstood the questions.

Last edited by Maschke; May 1st, 2014 at 11:10 AM.

May 1st, 2014, 05:14 PM   #3
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,685
Thanks: 2665

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 5.6.3 The new math Since I consider myself a great mathematician discovered that the current mathematics limited and there are a few mistakes, which is due to the large number of axioms.
Unfortunately, the link provided for the new math doesn't work.

 May 1st, 2014, 07:56 PM #4 Math Team   Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 14,597 Thanks: 1038 A google search on the name shows lots of stuff, like: I have warned msbiljanica on two occasions that he needed to engage with the others here and answer the fundamental questions being asked. The final deadline to do so has just passed without any such engagement. Instead, we got a repetition of the same incongruous and undecipherable nonsense. I appreciate there is an obvious language difficulty, but we were making no progress whatsoever. He is therefore now banned from posting again.
 May 1st, 2014, 09:20 PM #5 Global Moderator     Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC -5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms It doesn't work. My basic analysis: Mathematical Breakthroughs The paper comes down to claiming an invalid method in section 2, then applying it to a large number of problems. If the claimed result (all real numbers are constructible) was true the results would follow, but it's not so they don't.
May 2nd, 2014, 02:18 AM   #6
Newbie

Joined: Jan 2012

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie Unfortunately, the link provided for the new math doesn't work.
My mistake, here's the real link:
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Maschke I am afraid I did not read past your abstract, in which you claim to have solved the ancient Greek problems of squaring the circle, doubling the cube, and trisecting an arbitrary angle ... with straightedge and compass. Since it's well established by modern math that these problems cannot be solved, it's impossible that you've solved them. Rather, you've either made a mistake or misunderstood the questions.
elementary geometry can be constructed "straightedge (geometric straightedge) ", which modern mathematics does not know that she knew would not be resolved by the cubic equation .
so please tell me if you find a mistake there, I did not observe the rules of the task

that modern mathematics knows srlen function does not solve zeros of the zeta function,

I can understand if my math does not understand, because this is a completely different approach to mathematics, if you have a lot of axioms they restrict you to new discoveries (Euclid fifth postulate is impossible to present mathematics as a plane axiom (2-ents plane), but if the proof plane (2-ents plane, 3-ents plane, 4-ents plane, ...) this is possible.

I simply explain their ideas (maybe the problem is that I was born early, and very few of you understand ...)

Last edited by skipjack; May 4th, 2014 at 01:26 PM.

 May 2nd, 2014, 04:37 AM #7 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,685 Thanks: 2665 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra I understood the bit where you claimed that dividing up your straightedge into eight rather than ten made it somehow different in a non-trivial way. Now I understand that you are frustrated with the limits that are enforced on your maths by having axioms. In other words, you want more axioms. It's a novel approach. Ever since Euclid (and less formally, before then), mathematicians have worked to minimise the number of axioms. It is a perverse approach, because it means you have to prove results that you'd like to be accepted as true, rather than just assuming them. If we could just add new axioms as we wished, maths would become very easy, but also meaningless and contradictory. You'd be able to prove any old rubbish. Such as that it is possible to square the circle, trisect an angle or double the cube with only a compass and a straightedge. Last edited by skipjack; May 4th, 2014 at 01:29 PM.
May 2nd, 2014, 07:55 AM   #8
Newbie

Joined: Jan 2012

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie I understood the bit where you claimed that dividing up your straightedge into eight rather than ten maade it somehow different in a non-trivial way.
see Figure
aaa.jpg
You can also like
asa.jpg
The main thing is to give a geometric straightedge, how do we mark the points obtained by the point it does not matter

 May 2nd, 2014, 08:23 AM #9 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,685 Thanks: 2665 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra The problem is, that a straightedge does not have any markings on it anyway! And even if it did, it doesn't matter how you mark them, because it's just scaling. Ref: Wolfram Alpha
 May 4th, 2014, 09:34 AM #10 Newbie   Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0 When many huckster, bisection angle possible (by calculation), but when you measure accuracy - (n trillionth of a degree), then the resulting approximate angles (not the same, irrational), and therefore the bisection angle is impossible, it is indicative, as my trisecting ...

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post KyVanchhay Algebra 16 June 11th, 2013 10:26 PM soroban New Users 0 May 4th, 2012 01:26 PM TheReanimator Calculus 8 October 29th, 2010 04:00 PM Euzenius Number Theory 10 July 30th, 2009 04:43 AM ITConsultant1996 Elementary Math 3 June 24th, 2009 11:50 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top