
Elementary Math Fractions, Percentages, Word Problems, Equations, Inequations, Factorization, Expansion 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 1st, 2014, 08:21 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0  impossible task
See the attached pdf and you will clearly https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1 
May 1st, 2014, 11:08 AM  #2  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,393 Thanks: 749  Quote:
Since it's well established by modern math that these problems cannot be solved, it's impossible that you've solved them. Rather, you've either made a mistake or misunderstood the questions. Last edited by Maschke; May 1st, 2014 at 11:10 AM.  
May 1st, 2014, 05:14 PM  #3  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,685 Thanks: 2665 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
 
May 1st, 2014, 07:56 PM  #4 
Math Team Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 14,597 Thanks: 1038 
A google search on the name shows lots of stuff, like: I have warned msbiljanica on two occasions that he needed to engage with the others here and answer the fundamental questions being asked. The final deadline to do so has just passed without any such engagement. Instead, we got a repetition of the same incongruous and undecipherable nonsense. I appreciate there is an obvious language difficulty, but we were making no progress whatsoever. He is therefore now banned from posting again. 
May 1st, 2014, 09:20 PM  #5 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms 
It doesn't work. My basic analysis: Mathematical Breakthroughs The paper comes down to claiming an invalid method in section 2, then applying it to a large number of problems. If the claimed result (all real numbers are constructible) was true the results would follow, but it's not so they don't. 
May 2nd, 2014, 02:18 AM  #6  
Newbie Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0  Quote:
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1 Quote:
so please tell me if you find a mistake there, I did not observe the rules of the task that modern mathematics knows srlen function does not solve zeros of the zeta function, I can understand if my math does not understand, because this is a completely different approach to mathematics, if you have a lot of axioms they restrict you to new discoveries (Euclid fifth postulate is impossible to present mathematics as a plane axiom (2ents plane), but if the proof plane (2ents plane, 3ents plane, 4ents plane, ...) this is possible. I simply explain their ideas (maybe the problem is that I was born early, and very few of you understand ...) Last edited by skipjack; May 4th, 2014 at 01:26 PM.  
May 2nd, 2014, 04:37 AM  #7 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,685 Thanks: 2665 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
I understood the bit where you claimed that dividing up your straightedge into eight rather than ten made it somehow different in a nontrivial way. Now I understand that you are frustrated with the limits that are enforced on your maths by having axioms. In other words, you want more axioms. It's a novel approach. Ever since Euclid (and less formally, before then), mathematicians have worked to minimise the number of axioms. It is a perverse approach, because it means you have to prove results that you'd like to be accepted as true, rather than just assuming them. If we could just add new axioms as we wished, maths would become very easy, but also meaningless and contradictory. You'd be able to prove any old rubbish. Such as that it is possible to square the circle, trisect an angle or double the cube with only a compass and a straightedge. Last edited by skipjack; May 4th, 2014 at 01:29 PM. 
May 2nd, 2014, 07:55 AM  #8  
Newbie Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0  Quote:
aaa.jpg You can also like asa.jpg The main thing is to give a geometric straightedge, how do we mark the points obtained by the point it does not matter  
May 2nd, 2014, 08:23 AM  #9 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,685 Thanks: 2665 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
The problem is, that a straightedge does not have any markings on it anyway! And even if it did, it doesn't matter how you mark them, because it's just scaling. Ref: Wolfram Alpha 
May 4th, 2014, 09:34 AM  #10 
Newbie Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0 
When many huckster, bisection angle possible (by calculation), but when you measure accuracy  (n trillionth of a degree), then the resulting approximate angles (not the same, irrational), and therefore the bisection angle is impossible, it is indicative, as my trisecting ...


Tags 
impossible, impossile, task 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
impossible (prove that 0 = 1)  KyVanchhay  Algebra  16  June 11th, 2013 10:26 PM 
Impossible object  soroban  New Users  0  May 4th, 2012 01:26 PM 
Impossible to integrate?  TheReanimator  Calculus  8  October 29th, 2010 04:00 PM 
The impossible conjecture  Euzenius  Number Theory  10  July 30th, 2009 04:43 AM 
Is this possible or impossible?  ITConsultant1996  Elementary Math  3  June 24th, 2009 11:50 PM 