Elementary Math Fractions, Percentages, Word Problems, Equations, Inequations, Factorization, Expansion

May 5th, 2017, 09:24 PM   #11
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2015
From: USA

Posts: 1,760
Thanks: 903

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Monox D. I-Fly So the "true" answer is -1 degrees Celsius?
In this case, truth is in the eye of the person who wrote the question.

Last edited by skipjack; May 6th, 2017 at 06:17 AM.

May 6th, 2017, 01:03 AM   #12
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Indonesia

Posts: 1,767
Thanks: 121

Math Focus: Trigonometry and Logarithm
Quote:
 Originally Posted by romsek in this case truth is in the eye of the person who wrote the question.
I've checked, and found new paradoxes:
Should we multiply that 273 in Kelvin and that 32 in Fahrenheit with 4?

 May 6th, 2017, 06:05 AM #13 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,146 Thanks: 2386 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra Temperature is a measure of energy. A conceptually "correct" scale should equate the meaurement to the magnitude of the energy. Scales not having zero at 0 Kelvin don't do this.
 May 7th, 2017, 07:34 PM #14 Senior Member     Joined: Nov 2010 From: Indonesia Posts: 1,767 Thanks: 121 Math Focus: Trigonometry and Logarithm So, it's 803.45 degrees Celcius?
 May 7th, 2017, 10:33 PM #15 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,146 Thanks: 2386 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra That's my opinion, yes.
 May 7th, 2017, 10:41 PM #16 Math Team   Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 11,665 Thanks: 740 Hey Mr.Fly, why don't you move here: How Hot is Mercury?
May 8th, 2017, 12:15 AM   #17
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2014
From: UK

Posts: 800
Thanks: 297

Quote:
 Originally Posted by romsek the thing is you could make some other temperature scale, just as valid, with smaller increments. Then "4 times" as hot would result in a smaller absolute temperature difference. So the question isn't really meaningful.
You could, but you'd end up with the same answer but for that scale, using kelvin to calculate is correct because you have absolute zero and temperature is linear, all other temperature scales (unless you design log ones) will be some multiplication and offset from that. I don't think I've explained that very well, can someone help?

May 8th, 2017, 12:38 AM   #18
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2015
From: USA

Posts: 1,760
Thanks: 903

Quote:
 Originally Posted by weirddave You could, but you'd end up with the same answer but for that scale, using kelvin to calculate is correct because you have absolute zero and temperature is linear, all other temperature scales (unless you design log ones) will be some multiplication and offset from that. I don't think I've explained that very well, can someone help?
assuming a scale that had 0 at 0 kelvin you wouldn't need to convert to kelvin to do the computation.

This is what Archie mentioned a few posts back.

 May 8th, 2017, 05:08 AM #19 Global Moderator     Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City Posts: 7,741 Thanks: 1000 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond The temperatures are akin to vectors in the sense that -4 is a vector in the negative x direction with a magnitude of 4. With that, 4 times hotter than -4 is 12 degrees C.
 May 8th, 2017, 05:59 AM #20 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,146 Thanks: 2386 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra So 100 times colder than $0^\circ C$ is $0^\circ C$? I don't buy it.

 Tags cold, hot

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post BenFRayfield Physics 0 April 11th, 2014 02:42 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top