My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > Science Forums > Economics

Economics Economics Forum - Financial Mathematics, Econometrics, Operations Research, Mathematical Finance, Computational Finance


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
April 22nd, 2009, 07:10 AM   #1
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 1
Thanks: 0

[game theory] Election game

The game is: N players ("candidates") make their moves sequentially. The move is a decision to play or not to play, and if a player chooses to play, then he must take a real number from [0;1] (that would be candidate's "political views", 0 might mean "democrat" and 1 - "republican"). Every player knows all moves of previous players, but does not know moves of next players (e.g. the first player knows no moves, the last one - knows all moves). After all moves are made, votes are counted: number of votes for a candidate X equals the length of a segment, where all points are closer to the number proposed by X on his move, than to numbers, proposed by any other candidate. If k players have chosen the same number, than the length of correspondent segment should be divided by k. The candidate, who has the greatest number of "votes" is the winner and gets a prize = $1. All other players, who played the game, but lost, bear costs of $1 (i.e.their prize=-1). The players, who chose not to play, get $0 (no prize, no costs). Again, in case k players have got the same number of votes, the prize will be divided between these players equally: each player-"semifinalist" will get $(1/k). The goal is of course to win maximum amount of money.
The hypothesis:subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium for this game is: the first player choses the point 0.5 , all other players except the last chose not to play, and the last player also choses the point 0.5.
The problem: This statement is true for 3 players. I see no reason it will not be true for any finite number of players, but I have no idea how to prove that, so I will be grateful for any help, interesting suggestions/ideas or similar problems and literature relevant to the question.
Thanks in advance
lkzavr is offline  
 
April 22nd, 2009, 11:35 AM   #2
Global Moderator
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
From: UTC -5

Posts: 16,046
Thanks: 938

Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms
Re: [game theory] Election game

You may consider Black's theorem to be related:
Duncan Black, "On the Rationale of Group Decision-making", Journal of Political Economy 56 (194, pp. 23-34.
CRGreathouse is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > Science Forums > Economics

Tags
election, game, theory



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
game theory blabla Economics 1 January 19th, 2014 03:53 AM
Game theory gaussrelatz New Users 2 January 18th, 2014 06:43 AM
Analyzing a game for fairness? (game theory question) musicgold Economics 0 March 14th, 2012 08:04 PM
[game theory] Election game lkzavr Applied Math 1 December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM
game theory blabla Applied Math 0 December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM





Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.