My Math Forum TR and MR

 Economics Economics Forum - Financial Mathematics, Econometrics, Operations Research, Mathematical Finance, Computational Finance

 September 9th, 2017, 07:22 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Sep 2017 From: Latvia/Denmark Posts: 21 Thanks: 0 TR and MR Hello! I am not quite sure what do I need to do here. Help would be appreciated! Last edited by skipjack; September 9th, 2017 at 08:13 AM.
 September 9th, 2017, 08:16 AM #2 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,702 Thanks: 1804 TR = PQ = 100Q - 4Q² What definition have you been given for MR?
 September 10th, 2017, 03:18 AM #3 Newbie   Joined: Sep 2017 From: Latvia/Denmark Posts: 21 Thanks: 0 Yet, I do not see and understand why and what does the 0.3 and 12 mean in this context. I don't get how you get the answer too. Last edited by skipjack; September 10th, 2017 at 03:55 AM.
 September 10th, 2017, 04:48 AM #4 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,702 Thanks: 1804 P is the price of a unit of production and Q is the number of units produced. Hence TR (Total Revenue) = P × Q. If P were a constant, d(TR)/dQ would be P, which would be exactly the extra revenue caused by producing 1 more unit. If P isn't constant, but is given as a function of Q, it's reasonable to use d(TR/dQ) to estimate the change in TR due to a change in Q. If TR = Q(100 - 4Q) = 100Q - 4Q², MR = d(TR)/dQ = 100 - 8Q. You are probably expected to substitute Q = 12, to get MR = 4. As that would be an estimate of the change in TR due to a 1 unit increase in output, you need to multiply it by 0.3, giving 1.2 as your estimate of the change in TR due to a 0.3 unit increase in output. As the question is about an increase in Q from 12 to 12.3, you might wonder why I substituted Q = 12 rather than Q = 12.3. Indeed, why not choose to "split the difference" by substituting Q = 12.15? That would give MR = 2.8, so that your answer would be 0.3 × 2.8 = 0.84, which is a better estimate (spot on, in fact). Since when have economists been concerned about accuracy, though? I suggest you do what you were taught if you can. Thanks from vizzy22
September 10th, 2017, 06:09 AM   #5
Newbie

Joined: Sep 2017
From: Latvia/Denmark

Posts: 21
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack P is the price of a unit of production and Q is the number of units produced. Hence TR (Total Revenue) = P × Q. If P were a constant, d(TR)/dQ would be P, which would be exactly the extra revenue caused by producing 1 more unit. If P isn't constant, but is given as a function of Q, it's reasonable to use d(TR/dQ) to estimate the change in TR due to a change in Q. If TR = Q(100 - 4Q) = 100Q - 4Q², MR = d(TR)/dQ = 100 - 8Q. You are probably expected to substitute Q = 12, to get MR = 4. As that would be an estimate of the change in TR due to a 1 unit increase in output, you need to multiply it by 0.3, giving 1.2 as your estimate of the change in TR due to a 0.3 unit increase in output. As the question is about an increase in Q from 12 to 12.3, you might wonder why I substituted Q = 12 rather than Q = 12.3. Indeed, why not choose to "split the difference" by substituting Q = 12.15? That would give MR = 2.8, so that your answer would be 0.3 × 2.8 = 0.84, which is a better estimate (spot on, in fact). Since when have economists been concerned about accuracy, though? I suggest you do what you were taught if you can.
Your explanation is helping me tons. Thank you. As of this point, I understand simple differentiation, and have done my homework without mistakes. You are a lifesaver! Thank you again. I'll try to help people as much as you helped me!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top