|January 2nd, 2017, 03:40 AM||#1|
Joined: Apr 2013
Utility on negative wealth
can anyone kindly explain the intuition/interpretation behind defining utility on negative wealth (such as exponential utility)?
Last edited by skipjack; January 2nd, 2017 at 03:55 AM.
|January 2nd, 2017, 07:46 AM||#2|
Joined: May 2016
First, there is nothing that precludes the functions of economic theory from being defined piece-wise. It is usual in economics that interest is focused on a very small domain (the neighborhood of a point of intersection or of tangency for example) so that the nature of the function outside that restricted domain is irrelevant. Only the very best economists manage to remember consistently that the functions of economic theory are highly simplified idealizations.
Second, the opposite of wealth is debt. Just ask a few graduates about how warm and fuzzy they feel about student loan debt.
|negative, utility, wealth|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Super-Rich Wealth Distribution||BigDaddy||Economics||0||September 14th, 2016 01:41 PM|
|discounted negative utility function||natt010||Economics||0||November 26th, 2014 01:17 AM|