
Differential Equations Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
June 14th, 2017, 09:35 AM  #1 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 831 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित  Differential equation proof
Someone please prove this. I got exam tomorrow!! 
June 14th, 2017, 10:37 AM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 17,919 Thanks: 1383 
$\displaystyle \frac{\partial z}{\partial r} = \frac{∂z}{∂x}\cdot\frac{\partial x}{\partial r} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\cdot\frac{\partial y}{\partial r} = 2r\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + 2s\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}$, etc.

June 14th, 2017, 10:40 AM  #3 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 831 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित 
I know those rules but still can't prove. Could you give me some hint/help. Last edited by skipjack; June 14th, 2017 at 11:30 AM. 
June 14th, 2017, 11:31 AM  #4 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 17,919 Thanks: 1383 
You'll also need to use the product rule. Can you post your attempt?

June 14th, 2017, 11:51 AM  #5 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 831 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित 
The solution for second order partial derivative I got:
Last edited by skipjack; June 14th, 2017 at 09:41 PM. 
June 14th, 2017, 02:35 PM  #6 
Senior Member Joined: Apr 2016 From: Australia Posts: 177 Thanks: 22 Math Focus: horses,cash me outside how bow dah, trash doves 
The very first thing I would be trying is what is the implied solution under the additional assumption imposed by making the substitution f(x,y)= u(x,y)+v(x,y)*I into the pde. And then furthermore whether there are any initial values that can be dictated for u and v on (x,y). But, don't pursue with any guarantee of the line of enquiry bearing fruit; I'm pretty sporadic with what pops into my head first. Last edited by skipjack; June 14th, 2017 at 10:46 PM. 
June 14th, 2017, 10:39 PM  #7 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 17,919 Thanks: 1383 
You started off correctly, MATHEMATICIAN. As $z$ has continuous secondorder partial derivatives, $\displaystyle \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y} = \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y\partial x}$. You went wrong towards the end, but you didn't show every detail, making it difficult for me to say what exactly you did that wasn't right. For example, you correctly obtain $\displaystyle 2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}$, but this appears twice in your final line for no apparent reason. $\displaystyle \frac{\partial z}{\partial r} = 2r\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + 2s\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}$ $\displaystyle \begin{align*}\partial^2z/\partial r^2 &= 2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + 2r\!\left(\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x^2}\cdot\frac{\partial x}{\partial r} + \frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x\partial y}\cdot\frac{\partial y}{\partial r}\right) + 2s\!\left(\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y\partial x}\cdot\frac{\partial x}{\partial r} + \frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y^2}\cdot\frac{\partial y}{\partial r}\right) \\ &= 2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + 2r\!\left(2r\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x^2} + 2s\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x\partial y}\right) + 2s\!\left(2r\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y\partial x} + 2s\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y^2}\right) \\ &= 4r^2\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x^2} + 2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + 8rs\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x\partial y} + 4s^2\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y^2}\end{align*}$ 
June 15th, 2017, 03:38 AM  #8 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 831 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित 
Are you not using product rule in your second time differentiation? Could you please explain what you are doing. 
June 15th, 2017, 04:57 AM  #9 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 2,647 Thanks: 680 
Your reference to "second time differentiation" confused me because, at first, I thought you meant a second differentiation with respect to a "time" variable but there is no such variable! In fact, I think you mean just "differentiating the second time", taking the second derivative with respect to r. skipjack does use the product rule when he differentiates and gets , the coefficient for the first term being "2" because, of course, the derivative of "2r" with respect to r, is "2". But the second derivative with respect to r of the second term, has only one part because "2s" is independent of r (or, equivalently, the derivative of "2s" with respect to r, is 0). 

Tags 
differential, equation, proof 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Differential equation help  aletex  Calculus  6  December 11th, 2015 07:16 PM 
Gompertz equation  differential equation  Sonprelis  Calculus  6  August 6th, 2014 10:07 AM 
Show that an equation satisfies a differential equation  PhizKid  Differential Equations  0  February 24th, 2013 10:30 AM 
Help with differential equations proof!  eric3353  Differential Equations  4  May 29th, 2008 04:46 AM 
Help with differential equations proof!  eric3353  Differential Equations  2  May 28th, 2008 03:06 PM 