February 1st, 2017, 01:10 PM  #1 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Slovenia, Europe Posts: 46 Thanks: 5  basics > i*i
(1) $\displaystyle x^2+1=0$ (2) $\displaystyle x^2=1$ (3) $\displaystyle x=i$ (4) $\displaystyle i=\sqrt{1}$ (5) $\displaystyle i\cdot i=\sqrt{1}\cdot \sqrt{1\:}=\sqrt{\left(1\right)\cdot \left(1\right)}=\sqrt{\left(1\right)}=1$ which line is false? 
February 1st, 2017, 02:08 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: CA Posts: 1,265 Thanks: 650 
line (4) has no meaning. the domain of the square root function is $[0, \infty)$ 
February 1st, 2017, 02:44 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,414 Thanks: 342 
Also line 3 should be $x = \pm i$. And line 5 is not valid if the numbers inside the radical sign aren't real. Last edited by Maschke; February 1st, 2017 at 02:47 PM. 
February 1st, 2017, 05:44 PM  #4 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,857 Thanks: 2230 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  
February 2nd, 2017, 02:07 PM  #5 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 2,524 Thanks: 643 
This is why it is better not to "define" i as sqrt(1) (in addition every number has two square roots and there no good way to distinguish between them in the complex numbers). Better is to define the complex numbers as pairs of real numbers, (a, b), with addition defined "coordinate wise", (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ c, b+ d) and multiplication defined by [tex](a, b)*(c, d)= (ac bd, ad+ bc). Then, since (a, 0)+ (c, 0)= (a+ c, 0) and (a, 0)*(c, 0)= (ac, 0) we can identify the real number, a, as the pair of the form (a, 0). Also (0, 1)*(0, 1)= (0*0 1*1, 0*1+ 1*0)= (1, 0). We identify (1, 0) with 1 so if we define "i" to be (0, 1) we have i*i= 1 and can write (a, b)= a(1, 0)+ b(0, 1)= a+ bi. 

Tags 
>, basics 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
C programming. (basics)  srecko  Computer Science  1  December 6th, 2016 12:43 AM 
books for the basics  zahlenzbinden1  Math Books  2  November 30th, 2011 03:06 AM 
Set Theory Basics  netzweltler  Applied Math  28  October 19th, 2011 10:01 AM 