
Complex Analysis Complex Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
November 1st, 2016, 04:30 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Oct 2016 From: italy Posts: 9 Thanks: 0  Integral on a circumference
Hi guys, I got this function: $\displaystyle g(t) = \frac{e^{iz}}{(z)^{1/3}}$ I have to integrate it's derivate $\displaystyle g'(t)$ on the circumference of center $\displaystyle 0$ and radius $\displaystyle \pi$ oriented counterclockwise. The problem says also that $\displaystyle arg(z)$ is between $\displaystyle ]\pi,\pi[$ (determination of the cubic root). I thought to integrate the derivate and to apply Cauchy (the integral should be equal to the sum of the residues, but the residue in 0 is 0). Suggestions? Last edited by nostradamus1915; November 1st, 2016 at 04:33 AM. 
November 1st, 2016, 05:50 AM  #2 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,390 Thanks: 2100 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
OK, so you have the complex plane with a branch cut from zero out along the negative real axis. The integral of the derivative exists everywhere else, so the integral along any path that does not cut the negative real axis is $$\int_C f'(z)\,\mathrm dz = f(b)f(a)$$ where $C$ is a curve from $z=a$ to $z=b$. Now, to evaluate your integral, pick 2 points $z_1,z_2$ either sides of the branch cut on the given circle and let z them move towards the branch cut. Take the limit of the expression at the branch cut where the denominator is expressed in the form $z=re^{i\theta}$. 
November 6th, 2016, 09:04 AM  #3  
Newbie Joined: Oct 2016 From: italy Posts: 9 Thanks: 0  Quote:
 
November 6th, 2016, 10:14 AM  #4 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,390 Thanks: 2100 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
The branch cut for the cube root is along the negative real axis because we are given $\pi \lt \arg z \lt \pi$. The derivative $g'(t)$ therefore exists everywhere except on the negative real axis (where $arg z$ has a jump discontinuity) and $z=0$ where $g(z)$ does not exist. The integral of $g'(z)$ therefore exists everywhere else and is equal to $g(z)$. Therefore, the integral along any path from point $z_1$ to point $z_2$ that avoids zero and the negative real axis is equal to $g(z_2)g(z_1)$. Thus, we $z_1$ below the negative real axis on the circle $z=\pi$ and $z_2$ on the same circle but above the real axis. We define our path to be the part of the circle from $z_1$ to $z_2$ in an anticlockwise direction which avoids zero and the negative real axis, so the integral is $g(z_2)g(z_1)$. Now, we let $z_1$ and $z_2$ move around the circle towards the negative real axis, completing the circle. In this way $z_1 \to \pi e^{\pi}=\pi$ and $z_2 \to \pi e^{\pi}=\pi$. Thus $$ g(z_2)g(z_1) \to \frac{e^{i\pi}}{ \pi^{\frac13} e^{i\frac{\pi}3}}\frac{e^{i\pi}}{ \pi^{\frac13} e^{i\frac{\pi}3}}$$ Last edited by v8archie; November 6th, 2016 at 11:14 AM. 
November 7th, 2016, 10:56 AM  #5 
Newbie Joined: Oct 2016 From: italy Posts: 9 Thanks: 0 
Thanks for the help, just last doubt, shouldn't $\displaystyle g(z_1)$'s numerator be $\displaystyle e^{i \pi}$ ?

November 7th, 2016, 02:33 PM  #6 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,390 Thanks: 2100 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
No, because both $z_1$ and $z_2$ are heading towards $\pi + 0i$ but with arguments that are $2\pi$ different.

November 8th, 2016, 03:18 AM  #7 
Newbie Joined: Oct 2016 From: italy Posts: 9 Thanks: 0 
But I don't get why the denominators are different, if $\displaystyle z=\pi$ in both cases, shouldn't be $\displaystyle e^{\frac{i \pi}{3}}$ for both $\displaystyle g(z_1)$ and $\displaystyle g(z_2)$?

November 8th, 2016, 03:45 AM  #8  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,390 Thanks: 2100 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
$$e^{iz_1}=e^{iz_1e^{i\arg z_1}} = e^{i\pi e^{i\pi}} = e^{i\pi (1)} = e^{i\pi}=1 $$ Similarly $$e^{iz_2}=e^{iz_2e^{i\arg z_2}} = e^{i\pi e^{i\pi}} = e^{i\pi (1)} = e^{i\pi}=1 $$ Last edited by v8archie; November 8th, 2016 at 03:50 AM.  
November 8th, 2016, 05:28 AM  #9 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 16,369 Thanks: 1172 
In your earlier post, you omitted $i$ from two exponents.

November 8th, 2016, 09:46 AM  #10 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,390 Thanks: 2100 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
Thanks.


Tags 
circumference, integral 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
circumference of a circle  fil1977  Calculus  4  April 18th, 2015 06:24 AM 
Why do we use 22/7 for circumference and not pi?  Opposite  Geometry  7  August 29th, 2014 02:06 PM 
Circumference of a circle  Chikis  Elementary Math  7  January 22nd, 2014 05:46 PM 
ellipse circumference  kapital  Calculus  22  August 6th, 2012 09:53 AM 
Need help finding Circumference  beeson76  Algebra  0  November 2nd, 2010 12:25 PM 