
Complex Analysis Complex Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 2nd, 2012, 03:50 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 595 Thanks: 16  About Zeta integral expression
So the formula for the Zeta function is . Now I understand the contour comes from infinity just above the real axis, turn around the origin and comes back to infinite just below the real axis. I have multiple questions about this! 1) So it does not matter how much above/below the real axis the contour is, or what is the size of the circle around the origin is, the value of the integral is the same, is that true? As long as we have the singularity inside the contour and we do not intersect the real axis(because teh function has to be singled valued), the integral has the same value? Then is the integral equal to some residue at zero? Here, I guess the pole has no order defined if s is not an integer right? 2) If for instance s=2, then the function to integrate is analytic no? (because 1/(e^x1) has a simple pole ). But if it is true then why Cauchy theorem does not apply here? In other words, why is this integral not zero...because the contour is not closed? But then I am not sure to understand why the shape of the contour does not matter. 3) Finally, I don't understand why this integral converge for any s. I understand it for s>1, because even if the circle tends to zero , the integral on the circle goes to zero. If s<1, it seems that if the contour around the origin was going to zero it would blow up at that point....So is this integral simply converging because the contour does not pass right to the pole? But how to explain then that it would blow up if we go close to me pole... As you see I am very lost! Complex analysis is one of my weak point in maths. Even answer to one of this question would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. 
May 6th, 2012, 10:42 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 595 Thanks: 16  Re: About Zeta integral expression
Oups, Inknew it was not a trivial question, but this is simply the definition of the Zeta function on the complex plane....I guess most people don't really understand it finally, me included..!! I will work on it. cheers.


Tags 
expression, integral, zeta 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Why rotate Beukers's 0th integral to calculate zeta(2)?  inkliing  Calculus  1  October 16th, 2012 05:49 PM 
Double integral..LN expression  tinyone  Calculus  3  November 14th, 2010 10:33 AM 
Curve integral  expression simplification  honzik  Real Analysis  1  December 26th, 2009 03:16 PM 
Rewrite the expression as an algebraic expression in x  kev085  Algebra  1  April 24th, 2009 04:06 AM 
converting quadratic expression to a different expression  woodman5k  Algebra  2  October 10th, 2007 04:53 PM 