October 6th, 2008, 10:13 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 9 Thanks: 0  limit evaluation
Hi, Given is: Lim x>2 (x+2)/(x^3 + I make: Lim x>2 (x+2)/ [(x+2) (x^2 2x+4)] Why is the answer 1/12 ? Does (x+2)/[(x+2) (...)] simply sets a 1 on the numerator and leaves what's left as denominator? If so, what is the law(s)/method(s) applied to reach this? I hope some one can help me. Thanks. 
October 7th, 2008, 03:49 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: May 2008 From: York, UK Posts: 1,300 Thanks: 0  Re: limit evaluation
Hi One of the rules of limits is that as long as both and exist. In your case, you can write and I hope you can see why and that giving the required answer of 1/12. 
October 7th, 2008, 07:25 AM  #3  
Senior Member Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 895 Thanks: 0  Re: limit evaluation Quote:
You now get the result by direct substitution.  
October 19th, 2008, 11:43 PM  #4  
Newbie Joined: Sep 2008 Posts: 9 Thanks: 0  Re: limit evaluation Quote:
as the given formula is: lim x>2 (x+2)/(x^3 + I would rather make out of lim x>2 f(x)= lim x>2 (x+2) and x>2 g(x)= lim x>2 (x^3 + As I rationalize the denominator (that's probably not the right term in this case, but I mean making [(x+2)(x^2 2x +4)] out of (x^3 +) this also leaves me with (x+2)/[(x+2)(x^2 2x +4)]= 1/(x^2 2x +4) which is the same as the quoted formula g(x). here I don't use the rule lim x>a [f(x)g(x)]= lim x>a f(x) lim x>a g(x) So; I do understand the solution but not the way to get there.  
October 20th, 2008, 06:24 AM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: May 2008 From: York, UK Posts: 1,300 Thanks: 0  Re: limit evaluation
Hi The reason I did not use and is because the limit does not exist. What I am actually doing is being very pedantic and saying that you can't cancel the factors of x+2; i.e., since does not hold for all x (it is undefined for x=2). However, we can say that It's a fine distinction, but it sometimes pays to be pedantic! 
October 20th, 2008, 06:34 AM  #6 
Senior Member Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 895 Thanks: 0  Re: limit evaluation
EDIT: Mattpi beat me to it. Such a tempest in a teapot! (x+2)/[(x+2)(x^2 2x + 4)] = 1/(x^2  2x + 4) from simple algebraic principles studies well before the introduction to calculus. The working principle from there is that any number [quantity] divided by itself is equal to 1 except for 0/0 which is undefined in a finite number system. In the calculus it is that as x approaches 2, (x+2) is NOT equal to zero, and so the division can be done in a finite number system, those factors being eliminated. The problem here then is lack of understanding of the algebra, then of the calculus in that direct substitution in the final statement gives the required result. This manner of elimination of factors then substitution is so common in these problems it must have been encountered already. 

Tags 
evaluation, limit 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Evaluation of (sin x)^m (cos x)^n dx  Rejjy  Calculus  11  December 25th, 2016 08:56 PM 
A limit evaluation  guru123  Calculus  4  October 6th, 2013 02:32 PM 
int(1/n^n) evaluation  mathbalarka  Calculus  5  February 18th, 2013 12:53 AM 
Evaluation of error in limit of number e  date  Calculus  3  June 12th, 2012 11:51 AM 
multivariate limit evaluation, does the order in which we sp  notnaeem  Calculus  1  January 30th, 2011 12:34 AM 