
Calculus Calculus Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
October 25th, 2013, 01:08 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 251 Thanks: 0  When do you replace x when finding f'(a) using the def?
The original question is to prove that has no derivative at x=0. The answer is apparent from the graph, but we need to prove it. The problem really boils down to taking two onesided limits of the definition of derivative. The problem for me is that the absolute value of x+h is throwing me off. I haven't gotten rid of the h in the denominator. I can't distribute the 2 in front of the first absolute value and I can't assume that x is 0 yet (because you're supposed to apply the limit, and then substitute for x, right?), so I can't substitute for it or figure out a comparable expression for x+h. Nor can I split it into three separate limits by splitting the fraction, because that would leave h on the bottom of two of them. Note that I can get the same answer as my calculator if I substitute x=0, then finish the limit. Is my understanding that I can't replace x with 0 yet correct? If so, what's the next step? 
October 25th, 2013, 01:14 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2013 From: London, England Posts: 1,316 Thanks: 116  Re: When do you replace x when finding f'(a) using the def?
Since you're looking for the derivative at x = 0, you can replace x by 0 right at the beginning.

October 25th, 2013, 01:25 PM  #3  
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 251 Thanks: 0  Re: When do you replace x when finding f'(a) using the def? Quote:
I suppose that if x was other than zero, the same applies. And if we wanted to do this derivative in general, with unknown x, either I'm stuck at the above limit or we have to do a cases for x>0 and x<0. Yes?  
October 25th, 2013, 01:28 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2013 From: London, England Posts: 1,316 Thanks: 116  Re: When do you replace x when finding f'(a) using the def?
When x is not 0, then for small enough h, x+h is positive (when x is positive) or negative (when x is negative), so you can resolve the modulus function.


Tags 
def, finding, replace 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
replace indicator functions with convex conjugates?  Azalea  Applied Math  0  February 27th, 2014 04:56 AM 
Is it possible to replace in a term tangent by arc tangent?  me  Trigonometry  3  January 31st, 2008 09:30 AM 