My Math Forum Infinitesimal

 Calculus Calculus Math Forum

 October 19th, 2018, 11:19 AM #1 Senior Member   Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 250 Thanks: 3 Infinitesimal Is Infinitesimal is a "number"?
 October 19th, 2018, 11:53 AM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 841 Thanks: 323 Yes, it is (for example) a hyperreal number or a surreal number. More correctly: the hyperreal and surreal numbers contain infinitesimal numbers, plenty of them. The real numbers have no infinitesimals. So no, if you have an infinitesimal it is NOT a real number. (some people allow 0 to be an infinitesimal, I take it to mean nonzero here)
 October 19th, 2018, 01:11 PM #3 Senior Member   Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,343 Thanks: 732 I learned something yesterday. Euclid gave a beautiful example of an infinitesimal, a quantity less than any positive quantity. It's the horn angle of a circle on a line. That is, if you draw a circle tangent to a line, the circumference of the circle makes an angle with the line that is less than the angle made by any other line through that point in the direction of the circle. Of course today we'd say the horn angle is zero, since that's the limit. But it's interesting that Euclid recognized the idea of a quantity that was strictly smaller than any other positive quantity. https://mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/el...propIII16.html Thanks from ProofOfALifetime
October 19th, 2018, 01:59 PM   #4
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 841
Thanks: 323

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Maschke Of course today we'd say the horn angle is zero, since that's the limit.
We wouldn't though. Only recently Euclid's idea about the horn angle was vindicated. In algebraic geometry today, infinitesimals are allowed. And stuff like the Horn angles become easier to study with infinitesimals. The 1800's might have tried to shun the infinitesimal, in the 1900's we tried to get it to come back to us.

October 19th, 2018, 04:22 PM   #5
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 732

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Micrm@ss We wouldn't though. Only recently Euclid's idea about the horn angle was vindicated. In algebraic geometry today, infinitesimals are allowed. And stuff like the Horn angles become easier to study with infinitesimals. The 1800's might have tried to shun the infinitesimal, in the 1900's we tried to get it to come back to us.
I've heard of smooth infinitesimal analysis but I don't know anything about it.

In basic analysis the angle between two curves is the limit of their tangents, yes? Which is 0 in this case. Appreciate any clarity on this point.

October 19th, 2018, 10:28 PM   #6
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 841
Thanks: 323

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Maschke I've heard of smooth infinitesimal analysis but I don't know anything about it. In basic analysis the angle between two curves is the limit of their tangents, yes? Which is 0 in this case. Appreciate any clarity on this point.
Yeah, that's fine. The angle is definitely 0 in basic analysis and differential geometry. I wasn't contradicting you or anything. I was just trying to say that Euclid's idea of horn angles was very genius, because now we came up with similar things in very advanced topics like algebraic geometry.

Last edited by skipjack; October 20th, 2018 at 04:39 AM.

October 20th, 2018, 05:55 AM   #7
Banned Camp

Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 125

Quote:
 Originally Posted by shaharhada Is Infinitesimal is a "number"?
No. It is an arbitrarily small distance between two points. It is the fundamental concept behind calculus.

It can't be zero because you need two points to define a distance.

October 20th, 2018, 06:48 AM   #8
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,671
Thanks: 2651

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 Originally Posted by zylo No. It is an arbitrarily small distance between two points. It is the fundamental concept behind calculus.
This is ill-informed nonsense. Standard analysis and thus calculus uses only the finite - finitely large and finitely small.

Non-standard analysis makes use of infinitesimals to simplify some concepts and is closely related to how the theory was first developed, but infinitesimals are not required and certainly not fundamental.

 October 20th, 2018, 06:53 AM #9 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 841 Thanks: 323 I'm all for keeping zylo on this forum and discussing with him in HIS threads. But are we like really going to allow him to come on thread by newcomers and confuse them with his nonsense?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post shaharhada Algebra 9 November 10th, 2017 09:57 AM chuackl Linear Algebra 2 May 24th, 2014 04:17 AM dunn Calculus 6 January 28th, 2012 07:55 AM Ockonal Calculus 11 November 30th, 2011 12:57 PM fjingram Real Analysis 4 July 30th, 2010 04:07 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top