September 26th, 2018, 08:44 PM  #11 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 469 Thanks: 261 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics 
That article is misunderstanding the difference between differentiating under the integral (DUIT) and Feynman's trick. The example in question is an example of DUIT but not an example of Feynman's trick. The second example in that article illustrates both. DUIT is just a technique which allows (under some reasonable assumptions) to compute partial derivatives of an integral function. Specifically, given a function of the form \[f(x,y) = \int_a^b g(x,y) \ dy \] it is sometimes possible to interchange limit operations and write \[\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \int_a^b \frac{\partial g}{\partial x} \ dy \] Feynman's trick (also called parametric integration), while it does typically involve DUIT, is when you take an integrand in one variable, introduce a new variable which defines an integral function in that variable, and then differentiate it. The magic of this technique is knowing when this will work, and where to insert the variable. Feynman had a near supernatural ability to just see these things immediately. For example, in the second example of the link you posted, the author makes the following replacement \[ \int_0^1 \frac{\ln(x+1)}{x^2+1} \ dx \implies F(a) = \int_0^1 \frac{\ln(ax+1)}{x^2+1} \ dx \] The question is, why define $F$ that way? Why did the $a$ get placed where it did? How do you know that after DUIT, $F'$ will be easy to compute? This was what Feynman was famous for and this is the hard part. Computing the derivative after adding the parameter is trivial. 
September 27th, 2018, 01:00 AM  #12 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,700 Thanks: 1804  Are you able to divulge that problem? The linked article, having evaluated that integral (referred to by SDK) in its second example, states "this way is by far the simplest and most elegant, not to mention the quickest", which is incorrect. It can be evaluated very simply and elegantly as shown below. Substituting $\displaystyle x \to \frac{1  x}{x + 1},\ I = \!\int_0^1\! \frac{\ln(x + 1)}{x^2 + 1}dx = \!\int_0^1 \!\frac{\ln(2/(x + 1))}{x^2 + 1}dx = \!\int_0^1 \!\frac{\ln 2}{x^2 + 1}dx  I$, so $\displaystyle I = \frac{\pi\ln 2}{8}$. 
September 27th, 2018, 09:02 AM  #13  
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 101 Thanks: 24 Math Focus: Well... there are some open problems in Frame Theory that I'd like to work on.  Quote:
Last year, I solved this one (also from the AMM), which is similar to the second example: $\int_0^1 \frac{x\ln(x+1)}{x^2+1} \ dx \implies F(a) = \int_0^1 \frac{x\ln(ax+1)}{x^2+1} \ dx$. I put the parameter in the same spot. It was still tricky (for me because I'm far from a professional), but I was able to do it with this technique. However, the one that's featured now in the (AMM), although it is similar, might turn out to be hard for me since it is not at all the exact same. Quote:
I hope I can get through this problem I'm working on. Thank you both, you are amazing, and I have learned a lot from you! Last edited by skipjack; September 28th, 2018 at 12:14 AM.  
September 27th, 2018, 05:13 PM  #14 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,529 Thanks: 107  
September 28th, 2018, 05:01 AM  #15  
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,529 Thanks: 107  Quote:
The way to test it, if someone has a math program to do integrals, is calculate it for b=.1, .01, .001 to see where it is going.  

Tags 
lost, problem 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
lost in this story problem. help  shin777  Linear Algebra  1  November 28th, 2011 07:23 AM 
Completely Lost on Trig Problem  thar34ld34l  Algebra  1  July 9th, 2009 01:57 AM 
im lost  gomer7  Abstract Algebra  0  February 5th, 2008 09:29 PM 