August 2nd, 2016, 09:16 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Aug 2016 From: uk Posts: 1 Thanks: 0  Integration, confused
I am reading a research paper and I could not understand how the author derived the final equation using integration. Equation A: $Y_L=\frac{1}{1\beta}\left [\displaystyle\int_0^{N_L}x_L(j)^{1\beta}\,dj\right ]L^{\beta }$ Equation B: $x_L=\left [\frac{p_L}{\chi_L(j)}\right ]^{1/\beta}L$ Equation C: $Y_L=\frac{1}{1\beta}p_L^{\frac{1\beta}{\beta}}N_LL$ where,  $N_L$ is the number of varieties of machines  $x_L$ is the range of machines, so $x_L(j)$ is a machine type $(j)$  $\chi_L(j)$ is the price of machine type $(j)$ The author uses the equation B in equation A and derives the equation C after integration. It appears, the author replaces $x_L(j)$ in equation A with the equation for $x_L$ which is the equation B. Can anyone please help understand how this could be done? 
August 2nd, 2016, 03:50 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,627 Thanks: 622 
Statement A is puzzling. Is j the variable of integration? The description has j a discrete variable.


Tags 
confused, integration 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Confused  nathan  Probability and Statistics  4  September 26th, 2014 07:56 AM 
Confused  Shamieh  Calculus  3  September 7th, 2013 05:27 PM 
I am a little Confused.  Siedas  Algebra  9  March 10th, 2012 02:29 PM 
Confused  namarsha  Real Analysis  2  March 2nd, 2009 04:52 PM 
confused. please help!  ccfoose  Calculus  0  December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM 