User Name Remember Me? Password

 Calculus Calculus Math Forum

 July 31st, 2012, 04:21 AM #1 Member   Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 82 Thanks: 0 3-dimensional scalar field Hi! A 3-d scalar field h(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2-zx I need to find an expression for the scalar field h in cylindrical polar coordinates. So far I have cyclindrical polar coordinates are related to the cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) by x=p cos O, y=p sin O, z=z we see that x^2+y^2+z^2= p^2(cos^2 O + sin^2 O)+z^2 and - zx = -z(p cos O) hence h(p,O,z)=p^2(cos^2 O+sin^2 O) +z^2 -z(p cos O) (p>0, z>1) Not sure about the last bit. Can anyone help Arron July 31st, 2012, 05:57 AM   #2
Math Team

Joined: Mar 2012
From: India, West Bengal

Posts: 3,871
Thanks: 86

Math Focus: Number Theory
Re: 3-dimensional scalar field

Quote:
 Originally Posted by arron1990 Not sure about the last bit.
I don't see any faults in your approach. though I am not very knowledgeable on this part of mathematics (Polar Coordinate). July 31st, 2012, 06:30 AM   #3
Math Team

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 2,409
Thanks: 6

Re: 3-dimensional scalar field

Quote:
 Originally Posted by arron1990 hence h(p,O,z)=p^2(cos^2 O+sin^2 O) +z^2 -z(p cos O) (p>0, z>1) Not sure about the last bit. Can anyone help Arron
You know, I hope, that so you can simplify that a bit. Yes, (which looks like a p), although I would have used "r", must be greater than 0-. But what reason do you have to require that z> 1? There is no such condition in your original post. August 1st, 2012, 03:31 AM #4 Member   Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 82 Thanks: 0 Re: 3-dimensional scalar field Hi! Sorry not sure about that simplification. Could you go over that. Thanks August 2nd, 2012, 08:29 AM #5 Math Team   Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,409 Thanks: 6 Re: 3-dimensional scalar field I'm not sure what "simplification" you are talking about. Do you mean "? That comes from the Pythagorean theorem: if a right triangle has legs of length a and b, hypotenuse of length c, then . Dividing on both sides by , . In such right triangle, "sine" is defined as "opposite side divided by near side" so is sine and is cosine (or vice-versa, it doesn't matter). Then . To "simplify" what you have replace your "" with "1". But, again, why are you requiring that z> 1? Tags 3dimensional, field, scalar Search tags for this page

### 3 dimensional scalar field to vector field

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post watson Abstract Algebra 1 September 14th, 2012 09:07 PM SameOldHat Applied Math 0 April 9th, 2011 08:58 AM SameOldHat Linear Algebra 0 April 9th, 2011 05:35 AM cypher Linear Algebra 3 June 29th, 2010 01:40 PM brunojo Abstract Algebra 0 June 5th, 2009 06:25 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.      