October 2nd, 2011, 08:49 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2011 From: New York, NY Posts: 333 Thanks: 0  Simpson's Rule approximation
How large should n be to guarantee that the Simpson's Rule approximation to is accurate to within 0.0001? 
October 2nd, 2011, 10:16 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,211 Thanks: 521 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: Simpson's Rule approximation
My old calculus text states concerning the error bound for Simpson's Rule: If there exists a number M > 0 such that for all x in [a,b] then So, for we compute: Analysis of shows that is increasing on (0,1] thus we find: Thus: Since n must be even we find the minimum value of n is 26. 
October 2nd, 2011, 10:55 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2011 From: New York, NY Posts: 333 Thanks: 0  Re: Simpson's Rule approximation
some how it worked out the be 22

October 2nd, 2011, 11:08 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,211 Thanks: 521 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: Simpson's Rule approximation
Maybe I should have used: Then n would be 22. 

Tags 
approximation, rule, simpson 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Simpson's Rule for a vector  keresturec  Calculus  1  September 17th, 2013 07:37 AM 
Simpson's Rule  aaronmath  Calculus  1  October 2nd, 2011 10:36 PM 
Simpson's Rule  aaronmath  Calculus  1  September 30th, 2011 04:45 AM 
simpson's 1/3rd rule  rakeshkool27  Calculus  4  March 21st, 2010 03:35 PM 
Simpson's Rule  igodspeed  Calculus  1  March 3rd, 2009 11:53 PM 