My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Applied Math

Applied Math Applied Math Forum

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
October 11th, 2009, 01:10 PM   #1
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 115
Thanks: 0

not bounded

how could i prove that x to the third is not bounded: we know for a function to be bounded it has to be f(x) < or equal to a boundary say c
so for it to be not bounded there exists an x such that f(x) > c
so for x to the third > c
x> sqare root third of c
so x = square root third of c +1
so plug (square root third of c +1) into the function but then i get: c + (3*square root third of c^2)+ (3*square root third of c)+1
is that good enough or is this too complicated
wannabe1 is offline  
October 11th, 2009, 01:22 PM   #2
Global Moderator
CRGreathouse's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2006
From: UTC -5

Posts: 16,046
Thanks: 938

Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms
Re: not bounded

Looks fine. Technically it only works for c > 0, but otherwise just choose x = 1 (say).
CRGreathouse is offline  

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Applied Math


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Every totally bounded set in a metric space is bounded Pintosp Real Analysis 2 April 21st, 2012 01:56 PM
Bounded Subspaces Colossus_1 Real Analysis 2 October 19th, 2011 03:14 PM
region bounded by aaron-math Calculus 2 October 10th, 2011 12:25 PM
Prove that |f[x]| is bounded. sivela Calculus 2 January 15th, 2011 12:59 PM
Prove T is bounded 450081592 Calculus 1 March 7th, 2010 02:59 AM

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.