My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Applied Math

Applied Math Applied Math Forum


Thanks Tree1Thanks
  • 1 Post By Maschke
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
January 11th, 2019, 01:03 PM   #1
bas
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 17
Thanks: 0

Axiomatic set theory ZFC is inconsistent thus mathematics ends in contradiction

Axiomatic set theory ZFC is inconsistent, thus mathematics ends in contradiction:

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com...ATHEMATICS.pdf

Axiomatic set theory ZFC was in part developed to rid mathematics of its paradoxes, such as Russell's paradox.

The axiom in ZFC developed to do that, ad hoc, is the axiom of separation.


Quote:
. Axiom schema of specification (also called the axiom schema of separation or of restricted comprehension): If z is a set, and $\phi\!$ is any property which may characterize the elements x of z, then there is a
subset y of z containing those x in z which satisfy the property. The "restriction" to z is necessary to avoid Russell's paradox and its variant
Now Russell's paradox is a famous example of an impredicative construction, namely the set of all sets which do not contain themselves.

The axiom of separation is used to outlaw/block/ban impredicative statements like Russell's paradox,

but this axiom of separation is itself impredicative:


Quote:
"in ZF the fundamental source of impredicativity is the separation axiom which asserts that for each well formed function p(x)of the language ZF the existence of the set x : x } a ^ p(x) for any set a Since the formula
p may contain quantifiers ranging over the supposed "totality" of all the sets, this is impredicativity according to the VCP this impredicativity is given teeth by the axiom of infinity
but the axiom thus bans itself - thus ZFC is inconsistent:

[axiom of separation] thus it outlaws/blocks/bans itself
thus ZFC contradicts itself and 1) ZFC is inconsistent 2) that the paradoxes it was meant to avoid are now still valid and thus mathematics is inconsistent.
Now we have paradoxes like
Russell's paradox
Banach-Tarski paradox
Burali-Forti paradox
Which are now still valid.

With all the paradoxes in maths returning, mathematics now again ends in contradiction.

Last edited by skipjack; January 11th, 2019 at 03:32 PM.
bas is offline  
 
January 11th, 2019, 01:13 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,409
Thanks: 753

This is Colin Leslie Dean, "Australia's leading erotic poet." Well over a decade of trolling every online science and math forum with this crap. I don't mean to discourage people from being trolled and enjoying the fun, but please be aware of who and what this is about.
Thanks from topsquark
Maschke is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Applied Math

Tags
axiomatic, contradiction, ends, inconsistent, mathematics, set, theory, zfc



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mathematics ends in contradiction - an integer = a non-integer bas Number Theory 8 January 11th, 2019 04:53 PM
zylo's Axiomatic Set Theory zylo Math 16 January 20th, 2016 01:12 PM
Axiomatic Theory of Economics Grozny Economics 0 October 21st, 2015 11:11 AM
Contradiction of Galois theory raoofmirzaei Abstract Algebra 6 August 7th, 2011 09:58 PM
Mathematics Ends in Meaninglessness ie self-contradiction bas Applied Math 6 January 19th, 2011 05:45 AM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.