 My Math Forum Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1
 User Name Remember Me? Password

 Algebra Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum

 May 17th, 2009, 09:52 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 12 Thanks: 0 Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1 A line is usually defined as: But why is it done like that, using 3 variables (a, b and c) instead of the simpler: It's more concise, it uses fewer variables (a and b). For example intersection with X and Y axis: Pretty much all such examples show the latter formula to give more concise results, basically because This are simple examples because we deal with 2-dimensional lines, but it becomes more important as you go into bigger dimensions like planes in 3D being defined as instead of . Why is the more variables formula used by default instead of the simpler one? May 17th, 2009, 11:21 AM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 895 Thanks: 0 Re: Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1 There are several forms for most functions of this sort. Each serves a different purpose. Like a toolbox with an assortment of hammers, you can then choose the most appropriate for any particular problem. Your form ax + by = 1 is more commonly seen as the "Intercept form" x/a + y/b = 1. That is analogous to that form as in conic sections: x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2=1, and x^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2=1. These also have other forms, each suitable to a different purpose. When you get into vector algebra and lines, planes, and surfaces in 3D, you'll see different forms for the lines in space, again each serving a different purpose. "There's nothing new under the sun." May 17th, 2009, 11:41 AM   #3
Newbie

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Re: Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Dave There are several forms for most functions of this sort. Each serves a different purpose. Like a toolbox with an assortment of hammers, you can then choose the most appropriate for any particular problem. Your form ax + by = 1 is more commonly seen as the "Intercept form" x/a + y/b = 1. That is analogous to that form as in conic sections: x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2=1, and x^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2=1. These also have other forms, each suitable to a different purpose. When you get into vector algebra and lines, planes, and surfaces in 3D, you'll see different forms for the lines in space, again each serving a different purpose. "There's nothing new under the sun."
But why do they use division in x/a + y/b = 1, it doesn't seem to be a very good form. For example to create a horizontal line with y=1 you'd have to have b=1 and a=infinity.

With ax+by=1 you can simply have b=1, a=0. Seems more correct, so why is that form more commonly used instead of this one for example.

And where is the ax+by+c=0 form used? I looked on wikipedia but didn't find it used anywhere. What does the a, b and c represent, the slope, axis intersection position, or what? Thanks.

BTW: I am currently trying to understand the subject better from a mathematical perspective, but I'll eventually use what I learn in programming, thus my interest for simplicity in functions. Fewer variables => smaller, faster code. May 17th, 2009, 04:24 PM #4 Global Moderator   Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,806 Thanks: 716 Re: Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1 ax+by+c=0 is the most general form. ax+by=1 is restrictive in that you can't have a line through the origin (y=ax). May 17th, 2009, 05:51 PM   #5
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 895
Thanks: 0

Re: Geometrical definition of a line: ax+by+c=0 vs. ax+by=1

Quote:
 Originally Posted by manixrock But why do they use division in x/a + y/b = 1, it doesn't seem to be a very good form.
It is precisely YOUR form, but is more descriptive. If you wrote yours as Ax + By = 1, your A = my 1/a, and your B = my 1/b.

In any event, all of this is not to be rehashed here [and that is all it amounts to ...rehashing] after centuries of development have already established useful forms. The only point is that anything that contains only a first degree relation will be linear: F = (9/5)C + 32. Tags by1, definition, geometrical, line Search tags for this page
,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

# ax by c definition algebra

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Ryan_aus Algebra 2 January 19th, 2014 05:48 AM mrhesham Algebra 3 December 5th, 2010 11:51 AM kahalla Advanced Statistics 0 March 9th, 2010 01:24 AM grappler Algebra 1 June 11th, 2009 08:22 AM Revenant Real Analysis 4 June 28th, 2008 06:03 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.      