My Math Forum Completing the Square?

 Algebra Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum

 May 3rd, 2007, 12:19 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: May 2007 Posts: 18 Thanks: 0 Completing the Square? I know the quadratic formula is basically the completing the square method expressed algebraically. But does anyone know exactly why this method works? Why would one add (b/2a)²? Also, why does x²+bx+(b/2a)² = (x+b/2a)² ? Where does the x in the bx go?
 May 3rd, 2007, 02:44 AM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Nov 2006 From: I'm a figment of my own imagination :? Posts: 848 Thanks: 0 If you try completing the square with the equation ax^2+bx+c, then you will find that this is the quadratic formula. I don't have time right now to show this, but I will later if you are interested.
May 3rd, 2007, 03:41 AM   #3
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 0

Quote:
I always add (b/2)², and divide the equation out so as to make sure that a=1.

Quote:
 Also, why does x²+bx+(b/2a)² = (x+b/2a)² ? Where does the x in the bx go?
It's still there; try multiplying it back out, assuming that a=1:

(x+b/2)²
= x² + (b/2)x + (b/2)x +(b/2)² = x²+bx+(b/2)²

May 3rd, 2007, 04:22 AM   #4
Newbie

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 18
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Infinity It's still there; try multiplying it back out, assuming that a=1: (x+b/2)² = x² + (b/2)x + (b/2)x +(b/2)² = x²+bx+(b/2)²
Thank you for clearing that up.

I know how to get the quadratic formula from standard and normal form. My question isn't how but why this works. Is the completing the square method of adding (b/2)² just a trial and error method that proved correct, or is there some other justification for it?

May 3rd, 2007, 09:48 AM   #5
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 I know how to get the quadratic formula from standard and normal form. My question isn't how but why this works. Is the completing the square method of adding (b/2)² just a trial and error method that proved correct, or is there some other justification for it?
It makes it possible to factor otherwise un-factorable expressions.

For instance, suppose we have to find x in the equation x² + x + 1 = 0

There is no way to factor the thing, so we must complete the square in order to get it factored. x² + x + 1/4 + 1 = 1/4

That way, we can now write: (x + 1/2)² + 1 = 1/4

The completing of the square just lets us write it in factored form, since all we are doing is getting the expression into an expanded-square form, which can naturally be written as a square of some expression, in this case: (x + 1/2)²

So now, we can easily see that we can solve for x algebraically in our now-factored expression: (x + 1/2)² = -3/4

May 3rd, 2007, 11:22 AM   #6
Newbie

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 18
Thanks: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinity
Quote:
 I know how to get the quadratic formula from standard and normal form. My question isn't how but why this works. Is the completing the square method of adding (b/2)² just a trial and error method that proved correct, or is there some other justification for it?
It makes it possible to factor otherwise un-factorable expressions.

For instance, suppose we have to find x in the equation x² + x + 1 = 0

There is no way to factor the thing, so we must complete the square in order to get it factored. x² + x + 1/4 + 1 = 1/4

That way, we can now write: (x + 1/2)² + 1 = 1/4

The completing of the square just lets us write it in factored form, since all we are doing is getting the expression into an expanded-square form, which can naturally be written as a square of some expression, in this case: (x + 1/2)²

So now, we can easily see that we can solve for x algebraically in our now-factored expression: (x + 1/2)² = -3/4
Thanks for the explanation. I hope I'm not annoying, but my question still was WHY does adding (b/2)² do all that as opposed to some other operation? I know how to solve quadratics and all, but I never found deeper justification as to exactly WHY these methods work. Is it really just by chance that someone discovered adding (b/2)² solves quadratics or is that linked to other mathematical properties that elude me? I'm dying to know.

 May 3rd, 2007, 01:02 PM #7 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,927 Thanks: 2205 The methods don't work all that well at all. You get to crack a quadratic, but somewhat messily. Most higher-degree polynomials can't be cracked similarly, as there isn't a general method for finding exactly what the factors are.
May 3rd, 2007, 01:14 PM   #9
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2006
From: I'm a figment of my own imagination :?

Posts: 848
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 Originally Posted by skipjack The methods don't work all that well at all. You get to crack a quadratic, but somewhat messily. Most higher-degree polynomials can't be cracked similarly, as there isn't a general method for finding exactly what the factors are.
I will agree with you on that one; however, dispite how messy cracking a quadratic is, it is emphasized rather a lot (read: too much) in American High Schools (this also goes along with my rather lengthy paragraph above about math education).

May 3rd, 2007, 06:18 PM   #10
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 0

Quote:
 If students were taught problem solving (as opposed to having specific methods beat into their heads), mathematics would be more worthwhile and enjoyable for students.
That's the problem I've seen in a lot of the math classes I've taken so far.
The students all know that 1 + 2 = 3, but they can't figure out that because of that fact, 3 - 1 = 2. That's why I work hard to understand things at a basic level, so I can build from scratch or re-structure any formula I want. It's a very effective method, and works great. As a result, it is now a widely held belief among many of the students that I am a born genius, and that nobody could ever become as smart as they imagine I am unless they have some sort of 'magical touch'. This excuse allows the rest of the students to handily escape any guilt they feel over not having studied hard enough, because if I soundly beat them on some test or other, they just blame it on my 'unattainable genius' and still don't bother to work any harder. Of course, a few of the students (the very good ones) know better, but the average student just keeps blindly stumbling on, assuming a defeatist attitude and assuming that they'll never do any better than they are already doing. This attitude is so prevalent among many students that is shocks me to see how many of them really never learn anything new. Oh, they get more knowledge stuffed into their heads ( most of which they promptly forget), but they don't actually ever learn anything new at a basic level, nor do they ever change their method of learning, which is typically badly flawed. Moreover, it doesn't matter if they realize it's badly flawed, because they are convinced that they just aren't bright enough to fix it anyway. You know, it's the old story of the goats who won't go past the line in the field where the old electric fence stood, because nothing will induce them to think that the electric fence was removed 3 years ago. And if anyone does get over to the other side of the old fence line, the goats just convince themselves that he must have been born there, because how else could he have wound up on the other side?

 Tags completing, square

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

# write x² bx/a b²/4a² as a perfect square

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Trainpancake Algebra 3 October 2nd, 2013 02:11 PM pixelpaige Algebra 2 September 8th, 2011 05:39 PM l flipboi l Algebra 3 November 23rd, 2009 06:24 PM -DQ- Algebra 3 September 10th, 2009 05:51 PM PistolPete Algebra 15 May 20th, 2009 06:44 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top