Algebra Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum

 July 29th, 2014, 06:39 AM #1 Senior Member   Joined: Feb 2014 From: Louisiana Posts: 156 Thanks: 6 Math Focus: algebra and the calculus A line though two lines' intersection I'm doing homework for a math class, and there are problems relating to finding a line that passes though the intersection of two other lines. The general case for this is (apparently) described by the equation (ax + by + c) + k(dx + ey + f) = 0 where ax + by + c and dx + ey + f are the lines with the point of intersection, and where k is some number. This equation works for finding lines which pass though the intersection of ax + by + c and dx + ey + f, but I do not understand where this equation comes from or why it works. If anybody could explain, I would appreciate it. July 29th, 2014, 09:46 AM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Russia Posts: 327 Thanks: 108 This has to be explained in your textbook. Let $F_1(x,y)=ax + by + c$ and $F_2(x,y)=dx + ey + f$, and let $l_1$ and $l_2$ be lines determined by $F_1(x,y)=0$ and $F_2(x,y)=0$, respectively. Assume $l_1$ and $l_2$ intersect at $P_0(x_0,y_0)$. Then the following fact is true: All lines passing through $P_0$ are given by equation $\alpha F_1+\beta F_2=0$ for some $\alpha$, $\beta$. (*) If you take one such equation and $\alpha\ne0$, then you can divide the equation by $\alpha$ without changing the line and get $F_1+kF_2=0$ where $k=\beta/\alpha$. This form is what you are talking about. However, if $\alpha=0$, i.e., if the equation is $F_2=0$, then it cannot be represented in the form $F_1+kF_2=0$ for some $k$ unless $l_1=l_2$, i.e., unless $F_1$ and $F_2$ are proportional. Thus, a more precise statement is: Every line passing through $P_0$ is either $l_2$ or is determined by equation $F_1+kF_2=0$ for some $k$. Let's prove (*). Obviously, the line $\alpha F_1+\beta F_2=0$ passes through $P_0$. Conversely, let $l$ pass through $P_0$. Choose some $P'(x',y')\ne P_0$ on $l$; then $P'\notin l_1$ or $P'\notin l_2$ or both, so $F_1(x',y')\ne0$ or $F_2(x',y')\ne0$. Consider $F_2(x',y')F_1(x,y)+F_1(x',y')F_2(x,y)=0.\qquad(**)$ The coordinates of both $P_0$ and $P'$ satisfy (**), so (**) determines $l$. Strictly speaking, one needs to show that (**) is a first-degree equation and is not degenerate, i.e., does not have the form $0x+0y+0=0$. The fact that $\deg(F_2(x',y')F_1(x,y)+ F_1(x',y')F_2(x,y)) \le1$ is easy since $F_2(x',y')$ and $F_1(x',y')$ are numbers. But if the coefficients of $x$ and $y$ are zero in (**), then $F_2(x',y')(a,b)+F_1(x',y')(d,e)=(0,0)$, i.e., vectors $(a,b)$ and $(d,e)$ are linearly dependent and therefore $l_1$ and $l_2$ are parallel, which is a contradiction. Thanks from topsquark and Mr Davis 97 Tags intersection, line, lines ,

though two lines

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post marks2014 Geometry 1 May 9th, 2014 05:43 AM marks2014 Algebra 17 April 8th, 2014 08:49 AM Shamieh Calculus 2 January 19th, 2014 04:41 AM math12345 Algebra 3 April 3rd, 2011 10:54 AM TsAmE Calculus 7 September 9th, 2010 02:22 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top      