Algebra Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum

May 30th, 2014, 06:24 AM   #11
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2013
From: United Kingdom

Posts: 471
Thanks: 40

Quote:
 Originally Posted by weirddave If they are making 3 add-ons, then the time to make 1 of each is all that's required, then just copy it precisely why the question should be re-written. May 31st, 2014, 09:13 AM #12 Math Team   Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 14,597 Thanks: 1038 Hmmm...Todd told us this: "I'm a chef for 20 years and now attending school for Hospitality and Restaurant Management. I use to love math in high school. I am just now getting reintroduced to Algebra and would appreciate any help I could get." I don't think exotic solving ways is what he wants/needs; just sufficient to help him pass that HRM course. Using Greg's approach (my favorite!): 9A + 10B + 12C = 398  6A + 4B + 4C = 164  A + 2B + C = 58  Using elimination of variables, it can readily be determined that A = 6, B = 20 and C = 12. I'm pretty sure Todd wants to "remember" how above is accomplished. The easiest variable to eliminate first is C (2 multiplications only); multiply  by 3 and  by 12, and we now have: 09A + 10B + 12C = 398  18A + 12B + 12C = 492  12A + 24B + 12C = 696  Subtract  from : 9A + 2B = 94  Subtract  from : 3A + 14B = 298  Multiply  by 3: 9A + 42B = 894  Subtract  from : 40B = 800 : so B = 800/40 = 20 Now you can go back and substitute B=20; let's take : 9A + 2(20) = 94 9A + 40 = 94 9A = 54 A = 6 Now pick one of ,, and substitute A=6 and B=20 to get C : all yours to try! Thanks from Benit13 Last edited by Denis; May 31st, 2014 at 09:17 AM. June 4th, 2014, 03:07 AM   #13
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2014
From: Glasgow

Posts: 2,156
Thanks: 731

Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Denis I don't think exotic solving ways is what he wants/needs; just sufficient to help him pass that HRM course. Using Greg's approach (my favorite!): 9A + 10B + 12C = 398  6A + 4B + 4C = 164  A + 2B + C = 58  Using elimination of variables, it can readily be determined that A = 6, B = 20 and C = 12.
I agree. Matrix methods are sexier and cleaner, but certainly not easier to do or understand. Use elimination of variables until you learn matrices (which I recommend by the way, they're awesome).  Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top       