
Algebra PreAlgebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
March 28th, 2014, 10:17 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 Posts: 137 Thanks: 1  Tranformation of polynomials
I want to transform a polynomial of kind p(x)=ax³+bx²+cx+d in another like p(t)=At³+B. Is possible? Is possible to transform a polynomial of kind ax³+bx²+cx+d in another like t³+pt+q. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_...epressed_cubic But, I wish to eliminate the quadratic term and the linear term too... 
March 28th, 2014, 10:44 AM  #2 
Math Team Joined: Mar 2012 From: India, West Bengal Posts: 3,871 Thanks: 86 Math Focus: Number Theory 
Yes. You need some highly technical voodoo tricks to do that, though. See the link in my signature below. In general, this kinds of forms are called "Principle forms" and you need a quadratic Tschrinhausen instead of linear ones. 
March 29th, 2014, 02:27 AM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 Posts: 137 Thanks: 1 
And which are the principal forms of polynomials of 2Âº, 3Âº and 4Âº degree?

March 29th, 2014, 02:52 AM  #4 
Math Team Joined: Mar 2012 From: India, West Bengal Posts: 3,871 Thanks: 86 Math Focus: Number Theory 
In general, the corresponding principle form of Is I'll give a description of the transformation of the cubic for you here, to give a complete answer to your question : Let the general cubic be , where the second term has been reduced by the affine Tschrinhausen transformation for simplicity. Now let the transformed cubic be The roots of the latter and the former be related as All we need is to determine the coefficients, namely, and . OK, fine. Just sum up the three roots of the former and the latter cubic and use Newton : Now note that the sum on the left side is 0, as there is no quadratic term in . So and we know the value of . For the next step, square both sides of and sum it up through the roots again You can compute the powersums explicitly by using the relations given here, and then solve the quadratic equation in terms of and then plug in the value of found before. This gives you and , but we still don't have the resulting cubic. Of course one easy way to go would be to sub the transformation in the cubic and plugging in and etc. etc. but that would take lots of algebraic manipulation (in case you don't have a CAS and the tools for computing resultants). There is a way fortunately, I will show it here if you want. (it's given here, by the way, for a quintic instead) Balarka . 
March 29th, 2014, 10:32 AM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 Posts: 137 Thanks: 1 
This is my try: Solution for algebraic equations 
March 29th, 2014, 11:36 AM  #6 
Math Team Joined: Mar 2012 From: India, West Bengal Posts: 3,871 Thanks: 86 Math Focus: Number Theory 
This is not correct, no. Also, it is possible to prove that it is impossible to deduce a quintic to such binomial forms.


Tags 
polynomials, tranformation 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Linear Tranformation  davidmsf  Algebra  2  June 7th, 2012 12:13 PM 
Laplace tranformation  hampos  Real Analysis  1  May 28th, 2012 01:05 PM 
lagrange polynomials and polynomials...  ElMarsh  Linear Algebra  3  October 15th, 2009 04:14 PM 
Mobius Tranformation Proof....  TTB3  Complex Analysis  1  March 3rd, 2009 03:06 PM 
linear tranformation and integral  Buck  Real Analysis  0  November 21st, 2006 03:33 AM 