
Algebra PreAlgebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
July 27th, 2018, 03:59 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Apr 2014 From: Glasgow Posts: 2,132 Thanks: 717 Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions  Optimization problem
I have the following optimization problem: $\displaystyle \textrm{Minimize }f(x) + g(y)$ $\displaystyle x, y$ $\displaystyle \textrm{Subject to } h(x,y) = x + y  k = 0$ where the cost functions are quadratic: $\displaystyle f(x) = a_1 + b_1x + \frac{c_1}{2} x^2$ $\displaystyle g(y) = a_2 + b_2y + \frac{c_2}{2} y^2$ The Lagrangian is defined as $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = f(x) + g(y)  \lambda h(x,y)$ Therefore, the Lagrangian of this problem is $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}(x, y, \lambda) = a_1 + b_1x + \frac{c_1}{2} x^2 + a_2 + b_2y + \frac{c_2}{2} y^2 \lambda(x + y  k)$ The book that I have says that the KarushKuhnTacker (KKT) optimality conditions for this problem are $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = c_1 x  \lambda = 0$ $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = c_2 y  \lambda = 0$ $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = (x + y  k) = 0$ but if these are just partial derivatives of the Lagrangian, then what happened to $\displaystyle b_1$ and $\displaystyle b_2$? Should they instead be $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x} = b_1 + c_1 x  \lambda = 0$ $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial y} = b_2 + c_2 y  \lambda = 0$ $\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \lambda} = (x + y  k) = 0$ The book states that the solutions are: $\displaystyle x = \frac{c_2}{c_1 + c_2} k$ $\displaystyle y = \frac{c_1}{c_1 + c_2} k$ $\displaystyle \lambda = \frac{c_1 c_2}{c_1 + c_2} k$ If I include $\displaystyle b_1$ and $\displaystyle b_2$, I get the following solutions instead: $\displaystyle x = \frac{b_2  b_1 + c_2 k}{c_1 + c_2}$ $\displaystyle y = \frac{b_1  b_2 + c_1 k}{c_1 + c_2}$ $\displaystyle \lambda = \frac{b_1 c_c + b_2 c_2 + c_1 c_2 k}{c_1 + c_2} $ Last edited by Benit13; July 27th, 2018 at 04:06 AM. 
July 27th, 2018, 06:53 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,206 Thanks: 494 
This is truly a superficial response, but the book's answer (if correct) seems to imply that the b parameters are known (somehow) to equal zero (or to be negligible in practice). Since this model seems to come from economics, implicit assumptions may be hidden almost anywhere.

July 27th, 2018, 08:11 AM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 520 Thanks: 293 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics 
You are correct and the book is wrong.


Tags 
optimization, problem 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Optimization Problem  codyrawlins  Calculus  4  December 8th, 2017 10:23 PM 
Optimization problem  PhizKid  Calculus  1  December 13th, 2012 05:04 AM 
Optimization problem help  99rock99  Calculus  1  May 10th, 2012 08:10 PM 
Optimization Problem .. Please help  fantom2012  Calculus  6  April 25th, 2012 11:41 PM 
Optimization Problem  ryan.carmody  Calculus  1  November 25th, 2007 02:16 PM 