September 25th, 2017, 04:53 PM  #1 
Member Joined: Aug 2016 From: illinois Posts: 46 Thanks: 0  Solving for t
i cant figure out how to solve for t. 550=40t+50e^(.8t) 
September 25th, 2017, 05:43 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: USA Posts: 1,979 Thanks: 1027 
There is a closed form for the solution of $t$ but it includes a not very commonly seen function known as the Lambert W function. You can read more about it here the solutions are $t = \dfrac{5}{4} \left(W\left(\frac{1}{e^{11}}\right)+11\right)$ $t = \dfrac{5}{4} \left(W_{1}\left(\frac{1}{e^{11}}\right)+11\right)$ The solution involves manipulating the original expression to meet the template of the W function. I leave this to you. Is it possible you are meant to solve it numerically? 
September 26th, 2017, 06:50 AM  #3 
Member Joined: Aug 2016 From: illinois Posts: 46 Thanks: 0 
im not sure what you mean because we were ever taught that. some websites that i used said to factor out the t but i dont know how to do that with the t on the exponential.

September 26th, 2017, 06:56 AM  #4  
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: USA Posts: 1,979 Thanks: 1027  Quote:
there's no trick to getting a closed form solution for this expression. They must intend for you to solve the problem numerically.  
September 26th, 2017, 08:09 AM  #5  
Math Team Joined: Jul 2011 From: Texas Posts: 2,755 Thanks: 1405  Quote:
graph of the rearranged equation shows two solutions ...  

Tags 
solving 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Solving for x  hturnevarc  Algebra  0  December 5th, 2015 02:46 AM 
Solving Q(z)=z^4+1  henrymerrild  Complex Analysis  3  September 25th, 2013 09:08 AM 
Solving lim x>? e^x cos x  gesoocreesto  Calculus  2  June 10th, 2013 06:05 PM 
solving for x  trecipher617  Algebra  4  April 28th, 2013 10:32 PM 
Solving f(x)=f(2x+1)+f(2x+2) for f  Mircode  Real Analysis  0  February 4th, 2013 11:22 AM 