January 1st, 2013, 09:18 PM  #1  
Newbie Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0  Stats question
I ran across the following in a post by an Austrian professor who, at the time, was advocating the death penalty for Global Warming deniers. He has since apologized, and retracted his stand. The Global Warming bit doesn't really interest me, and isn't relevant. It's that statistics part I'm curious about. So here's the quote (with one parenthetical clarification by me): Quote:
Obviously there's a chance that if the scientists are wrong, they still might be partially right, but it's hard to see whether or not that's how he's getting to his 10 million number. The one potential flaw I can see in my own logic is that I'm assuming there are only two outcomes, and that they are mutually exclusive. If that's not the case, then the 10 million number could make sense. Anyway, that's my read on all of this, am I right, or is our Austrian professor?  
January 2nd, 2013, 03:02 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,754 Thanks: 695  Re: Stats question
All the professor is doing is computing the mathematical expectation. In this context it is meaningless since we are dealing with a one time event (GW or not GW), while expectations are useful when the experiments are repeated.


Tags 
question, stats 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Stats question [thanks!]  jackinda  Algebra  2  January 18th, 2011 10:11 AM 
hard stats question  riotsandravess  Advanced Statistics  1  November 18th, 2010 09:59 AM 
Stats Question  maths_123  Algebra  1  November 1st, 2009 04:22 AM 
Stats question: The Secretary Question word problem  pudro  Algebra  0  November 10th, 2008 08:12 PM 
Quick Stats Question  WhiteHotPro  Algebra  1  March 20th, 2008 12:56 PM 