My Math Forum (http://mymathforum.com/math-forums.php)
-   Algebra (http://mymathforum.com/algebra/)
-   -   Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definition? (http://mymathforum.com/algebra/20479-arithmetic-mean-why-use-its-computation-its-definition.html)

 Evroe August 10th, 2011 02:03 PM

Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definition?

Why do teachers/profs and textbooks define the arithmetic mean using its method of computation?

For example, they don't do it for the sine function, which they define as the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle. Then they give a method to compute the sine. And they don't do it for any other math function.

Using a method of computation as the definition also causes circular reasoning.

 The Chaz August 10th, 2011 02:16 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe Why do teachers/profs and textbooks define the arithmetic mean using its method of computation? For example, they don't do it for the sine function, which they define as the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle. Then they give a method to compute the sine. And they don't do it for any other math function. Using a method of computation as the definition also causes circular reasoning.
I don't follow.
The arithmetic mean of two numbers is their average. You compute this by summing them and then halving the result.
The sine ratio of a base angle in a right triangle is the ratio of the opposite side to the hypotenuse. You calculate this by forming a ratio.

$e^x$ can be defined as $\sum_{k= 0}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{k!}$ and then you calculate it term by term...

Are we going to see links to external sites in your posts soon (<--- cynicism warranted)

 greg1313 August 10th, 2011 05:48 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe For example, they don't do it for the sine function, which they define as the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe Using a method of computation as the definition also causes circular reasoning.
How so?

 Evroe August 10th, 2011 06:47 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

I'm asking because all the authorities of the arithmetic mean (or the "average") that I have researched provide the computation of the mean as its definition. As to your request to provide external sites, all the ones I've researched give the algorithm as the definition. For example, Encyclopedia Britannica says:
Quote:
 The arithmetic mean, denoted x, of a set of n numbers x1, x2, …, xn is defined as the sum of the numbers divided by n.
In another example, the sine of an angle is the ratio of the length of the opposite side divided by the length of the hypotenuse. The sine of angle ? can be computed (or characterized) using the Taylor series, sin(?) = ? – ?^3/3! + ?^5/5! – ?^7/7! + ... etc, as well as using a continued fraction. The algorithm using the Taylor series is not its definition, and hopefully, we will never see it (or any other characterization) used as its definition.

As for your example of e^x, Wikipedia says that "the exponential function e^x can be characterized in a variety of equivalent ways". In particular it may be defined by the power series (which you provided), but also by a continued fraction ... obtained via an identity of Euler. So, claiming that the algorithm is the definition forces us to claim that e^x has multiple definitions. This is simply not so. Only one definition exists, which can be characterized several ways.

So, when I ask for the definition of the arithmetic mean, I want the definition from which the algorithm derives.

 greg1313 August 10th, 2011 07:57 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe I want the definition from which the algorithm derives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_mean#Definition

 Evroe August 11th, 2011 01:42 AM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg1313
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe I want the definition from which the algorithm derives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_mean#Definition

As with many other authorities, Wikipedia gives the algorithm/computation as the definition.

 greg1313 August 11th, 2011 01:49 AM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

It's a sum, and I don't see why you're making a distinction in the first place. In reference to your remark about the sine ratio, dividing the length of a side of a right angled triangle by the length of its hypotenuse is as much a computation as adding together n numbers and dividing the result by n.

 mattpi August 11th, 2011 02:46 AM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

There's nothing wrong or logically fallacious with defining a function using an algorithmic description. How else do you define the Ackermann function, for example?

 CherryPi August 11th, 2011 05:02 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mattpi There's nothing wrong or logically fallacious with defining a function using an algorithmic description. How else do you define the Ackermann function, for example?
Obviously you exclude the last few 50 years of computer science and just say, "Bro, it's a big thingy that make big numbers."

 Pell's fish August 11th, 2011 11:41 PM

Re: Arithmetic mean: Why use its computation as its definiti

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Evroe As with many other authorities, Wikipedia gives the algorithm/computation as the definition.
Why do you think that it can't be defined like that?
Why do you think that should exist a definition befores the formula?
Do you have such definition?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM.