
Algebra PreAlgebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
December 22nd, 2010, 04:46 PM  #1 
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Viet Nam and US Posts: 36 Thanks: 0  Inequality solve
Hi guys I'm new, I need help in this topic Solve: [color=#008000] (1)[/color] I'm trying to use another variable to replace x (sorry about my English, I'm Asian, I just love math ). So I do: Let [color=#008000] (2)[/color] [color=#008000] (1)(2)[/color] And I'm stuck there 
December 22nd, 2010, 05:38 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,469 Thanks: 2038 
Where did "10t" spring from? You have 3x = t²  2, so multiply the original equation by 3 and then substitute for 3x throughout and find the nonnegative values of t that satisfy the inequality, etc.

December 22nd, 2010, 05:56 PM  #3  
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Viet Nam and US Posts: 36 Thanks: 0  Quote:
About where "10t" comes from, I mistyped, it must be "10xt" let me explain: We have and The original inequality can be rewritten: or And that's how I came up, I need another better solution I guess  
December 22nd, 2010, 06:10 PM  #4 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,469 Thanks: 2038 
That's precisely what I gave you  multiply the original equation by 3, etc. You'll find it easy if you try it. Alternatively, plot the graph of the lefthand side of the original equation.

December 22nd, 2010, 07:33 PM  #5  
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Viet Nam and US Posts: 36 Thanks: 0  Re: Quote:
Multiply both sides by 3, substitute and simplify: Factor out (I don't know how to explain, just see the line below) the result, we have: Listed the solutions orderly, we have: So in order to make the equation satisfy, we have to pick: But that is the way we pick t, how about x? The main reason is to solve x. I think I mislead somewhere!  
December 22nd, 2010, 07:48 PM  #6  
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,469 Thanks: 2038  Quote:
 
December 22nd, 2010, 08:09 PM  #7  
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Viet Nam and US Posts: 36 Thanks: 0  Re: Quote:
Multiply both sides by 3, substitute and simplify: Factor out and we have: Listed the solutions orderly, we have: So in order to make the equation satisfy, we have to pick: I think it's ok now, but how about x? That solution now works for t only. I'm not sure what you mean by "only nonnegative values of t are of interest" (language limit I'm sorry).  
December 22nd, 2010, 08:52 PM  #8 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,469 Thanks: 2038 
Your (x + 1)² should be (t + 1)², but can be omitted (just solve 2t² + 10t + 5 ? 0). You solved incorrectly. You need t ? 0, so 0 ? t ? (3 + ?35)/2. Hence 0 ? t² ? (22  3?35)/2, i.e., 0 ? 3x + 2 ? (22  3?35)/2, and so 2/3 ? x ? (6  ?35)/2. 
December 22nd, 2010, 09:00 PM  #9  
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Viet Nam and US Posts: 36 Thanks: 0  Re: Quote:
 

Tags 
inequality, solve 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
solve the inequality: x2x>2  mattematicarka  Algebra  2  February 6th, 2013 11:22 AM 
Solve an inequality hence solve another inequality  Punch  Algebra  3  July 2nd, 2012 12:43 PM 
Solve the Inequality.  jattrockz  Algebra  5  November 10th, 2011 05:07 AM 
How to solve this inequality ?  silvercats  Linear Algebra  13  June 6th, 2011 07:48 AM 
how to solve this inequality  sikwn32  Algebra  5  August 30th, 2009 02:12 PM 