My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > High School Math Forum > Algebra

Algebra Pre-Algebra and Basic Algebra Math Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
June 23rd, 2010, 12:42 AM   #11
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

I have created an image which I want to upload, but it doesn't work...
is it due to my status or because of an error?
MG85 is offline  
 
June 23rd, 2010, 01:18 AM   #12
Math Team
 
Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 361

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

Hello MG85,

I maybe have an image that represents your question.

Now, in other words, you are to proof that the area where "2 books are on top of each other, so 2 books thick" is larger than the area where "the area is one layer thick, so no overlay"
I hope, the english and the idea are correct.

Hoempa
Hoempa is offline  
June 24th, 2010, 02:56 AM   #13
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

To make it more understandable I created a geo file, as I didn't have webspace I am only able to set a link to a photoalbum...

http://de.fotoalbum.eu/gezi999/a490791/00000001

it has to be proved that the green area is always bigger than half of the rectangle's area...
MG85 is offline  
June 24th, 2010, 03:32 AM   #14
Math Team
 
Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 361

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

Do you have an extra assumption that the centres of the 2 rectangles are on top of each other? The question, skipjack found, doesn't say so.

Hoempa
Hoempa is offline  
June 24th, 2010, 09:51 AM   #15
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 12
Thanks: 0

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

No, there is not an assumption like that, but I didn't know how to realize it with dynageo...
MG85 is offline  
June 24th, 2010, 11:45 AM   #16
Math Team
 
Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 361

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

Suggestion: Maybe you could reflect all the area's with "one rectangle" into the green zone and show there is some space left.

Hoempa
Hoempa is offline  
June 25th, 2010, 08:51 PM   #17
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,471
Thanks: 2038

Let p = (area of overlap)/(area of rectangle) and r = (length of rectangle)/(width of rectangle).
It seems that p can be considerably larger than 1/2, but can be arbitrarily close to 1/2 if r is sufficiently large.

If rectangle ABCD (where AB > BC) is placed first, one can place the second rectangle, A'B'C'D' (where A'B' > B'C'), so that D' is very close to D and A' almost lies on AB. In the limiting case, where D and D' coincide and A' lies on AB, I find that p = rē - r?(rē - 1), which tends to 1/2 as r tends to infinity.

However, the above placement method isn't optimal if r is not large (since p tends to 1 as r tends to 1), and I haven't proved that it's optimal when r is large. Perhaps a better approach would be to consider the general case, using three variables to specify the position of the second rectangle in relation to the first. That would be a bit tedious, but shouldn't be unduly difficult.
skipjack is offline  
June 26th, 2010, 01:46 AM   #18
Math Team
 
Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 361

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

I have tried something yesterday, on the puzzle. I think it will be tedious, I donīt even know whether itīs possible to proof so.

We could use the cosine rule, generally:


I donīt know the formula to calculate the surface of a triangle. I do know this: surface=0.5*side*height, but there must have been another.
It used the sides of the triangle. Surface=. Too bad I donīt know the formula. Maybe we could use that to define
the surfaces of all areas without overlap.

Referring to the image, MG85 posted,
The area with overlap could be described by for example , , , and then quadrangle IKEG, by splitting in for example and
The formula for surface of triangles will be needed to do so, for we have the sides.

Again, this method is tedious if possible to proof so

Hoempa
Hoempa is offline  
June 26th, 2010, 02:49 AM   #19
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,471
Thanks: 2038

The usual form of the cosine rule is cē = aē + bē - 2ab cos C. Heron's formula gives a triangle's area in terms of the lengths of the sides of the triangle, but is unlikely to be useful here.
skipjack is offline  
June 26th, 2010, 03:12 AM   #20
Math Team
 
Joined: Apr 2010

Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 361

Re: geometrical question about congruent rectangles

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipjack
cē = aē + bē - 2ab cos C
Iīll edit that one, thanks

Anyway, it was worth trying, thanks for the reply!
Hoempa is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > High School Math Forum > Algebra

Tags
congruent, geometrical, question, rectangles



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rectangles mathkid Calculus 12 October 25th, 2012 10:00 PM
Rectangles and Squares meghraj Algebra 3 September 3rd, 2012 04:54 AM
Similar rectangles Denis Algebra 7 November 13th, 2011 07:00 PM
on Latin rectangles Wojciech_B Applied Math 0 January 22nd, 2011 06:20 AM
x^2 congruent to 2 mod 5 sea_wave Number Theory 4 February 10th, 2010 11:16 PM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.