My Math Forum Equivalence Relation Question

 Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum

 October 10th, 2014, 10:53 AM #1 Member     Joined: Jun 2011 From: California Posts: 82 Thanks: 3 Math Focus: Topology Equivalence Relation Question Hi all! I'm reading right now about the quotient topology and quotient spaces, and I've come across an example that uses this statement: "On $\mathbb{R}^2$, let $\equiv$ be the equivalence relation generated by $(x, y) \equiv (-x, y)$." I'm not familiar with this treatment of equivalence relations; I'm used to a book explicitly defining an equivalence relation in the way of "$(x, y) \equiv (a, b)$ if and only if . . ." . Do I just treat this as "The equivalence relation on $\mathbb{R}^2$ such that every point $(x, y)$ is related to the point $(x, y)$"? If not, how do treat this? Having a Master's, I'm well acquainted with equivalence relations, but I'm hoping I wasn't just spacing out as an undergrad on the day equivalence relations were taught in my introductory proofs class. Last edited by matthematical; October 10th, 2014 at 10:57 AM.
October 10th, 2014, 03:46 PM   #2
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Russia

Posts: 327
Thanks: 108

Quote:
 Originally Posted by matthematical "On $\mathbb{R}^2$, let $\equiv$ be the equivalence relation generated by $(x, y) \equiv (-x, y)$."
This means that $\equiv$ is the reflexive, symmetric and transitive closure of the given relation, i.e., the smallest equivalence relation containing the given one. In this case, one only has to take the reflexive closure, I believe.

 Tags equivalence, question, relation

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tom33 Algebra 3 January 17th, 2014 05:30 PM Taladhis Abstract Algebra 2 February 11th, 2013 09:20 AM jrklx250s Real Analysis 3 December 7th, 2011 11:42 AM jstarks4444 Number Theory 1 October 30th, 2011 07:39 PM tinynerdi Abstract Algebra 1 January 11th, 2010 10:24 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top