
Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
November 24th, 2017, 05:03 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Oct 2017 From: sweden Posts: 24 Thanks: 0  Understanding ring homomorphisms
So trying to study chapters on ring homomophisms and integral domains, and there is this one problem in the book where I just don't get how to show the kind of problems yet (as I'm not yet used to it); the problem is: Show that the matrices $R=\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ 0 & a \\ \end{pmatrix}$ for $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$ is a subring of the ring of matrices $M_2(\mathbb{R})$, also find a ring homomorphism such that $\Phi:R \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ that is onto. I will appreciate the help as I am very new to ring homomoprhisms. Last edited by skipjack; November 24th, 2017 at 11:41 AM. 
November 24th, 2017, 09:54 AM  #2 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 3,264 Thanks: 902 
You know what a ring is don't you? To show that the set of all matrices of the form $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a\end{pmatrix}$ is a ring, you need to show 1) It is closed under matrix addition $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}p & q\\ 0 & p \end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}r & s \\ 0 & t\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}p+ r & q+ s \\ 0 & p+ r\end{pmatrix}$ is of that same form. 2) It contains the additive identity: $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}$ is of this form with $\displaystyle a= b= 0$. 3) Addition is associative. $\displaystyle \left(\begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a \end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}c & d \\ 0 & c\end{pmatrix}\right)+ \begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}a+ c & b+ d \\ 0 & a+ c\end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} (a+ c)+ e & (b+ d)+ f \\ 0 & (a+ c)+ e\end{pmatrix}$ $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a \end{pmatrix}+ \left(\begin{pmatrix}c & d \\ 0 & c\end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e \end{pmatrix}\right)= \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a\end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}c+e & d+f \\ 0 & c+e\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} a+ (c+ e) & b+ (d+ f) \\ 0 & a+ (c+ e)\end{pmatrix}$ Essentially, that follows from the fact that matrix addition is "element wise" and addition of numbers is "associative". For multiplication, you only have to prove that 4) It is closed under matrix multiplication. $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}c & d \\ 0 & c \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}ac & ad+ bc \\ 0 & ac\end{pmatrix}$ In a ring, there is not necessarily a multiplicative identity nor multiplicative inverses, so we don't need to show that. (Actually, this is a "ring with identity: $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$ with $\displaystyle a= 1,\ b= 0$ is the multiplicative identity. The matrix $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ is of this form, but does not have an inverse.) 5) Multiplication is associative: $\displaystyle \left(\begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}c & d \\ 0 & c\end{pmatrix}\right)\begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}ac & ad+ bc \\ 0 & ac\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} ace & acf+ ade+ bce \\ 0 & ace\end{pmatrix}$ A ring homomorphism that is "onto" (but not onetoone) maps $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ 0 & a\end{pmatrix}$ is simply "a". Last edited by skipjack; November 24th, 2017 at 10:26 PM. 
November 24th, 2017, 03:05 PM  #3 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 3,264 Thanks: 902 
Above I neglected the second part of "multiplication is associative". $\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a\end{pmatrix}\left(\begin{pmatrix}c & d \\ 0 & c\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}e & f \\ 0 & e\end{pmatrix}\right)$$\displaystyle = \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 0 & a\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}ce & cf+ de \\ 0 & ce\end{pmatrix}$$\displaystyle = \begin{pmatrix}ace & acf+ ade+ bce \\ 0 & ace\end{pmatrix}$. 
November 24th, 2017, 03:23 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2017 From: United Kingdom Posts: 311 Thanks: 109 Math Focus: Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry  You still need to show 2') $R$ contains additive inverses 6) addition is commutative 7) multiplication and addition distribute over each other Note that 2') and 1) immediately imply 2). Also, the fact that $R$ is a subset of the ring $M_2(\mathbb{R})$ and has the same addition/multiplication (except restricted to $R$) gives 3), 5), 6) and 7) for free. 
December 31st, 2017, 07:51 AM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 770 Thanks: 276  
December 31st, 2017, 09:03 AM  #6  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2017 From: United Kingdom Posts: 311 Thanks: 109 Math Focus: Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry  Quote:
I've noticed a mistake in my post, though  conditions 2)' and 1) only give 2) (existence of additive identity) if we know the set is nonempty. And to show the set is nonempty, often the best way to go is to show 2) directly!  
January 2nd, 2018, 07:25 AM  #7  
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 770 Thanks: 276  Quote:
 
January 2nd, 2018, 04:49 PM  #8  
Member Joined: Aug 2011 From: Nouakchott, Mauritania Posts: 85 Thanks: 14 Math Focus: Algebra, Cryptography 
Salam ! Quote:
$\displaystyle \begin{array}{cccc} \Phi:&R &\rightarrow&\mathbb{R}\\ &M=\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\0&a\end{pmatrix}&\mapsto & \Phi(M)=a\end{array}$. Now you can try to check if :  $\displaystyle \Phi(M+N)=\Phi(M)+\Phi(N)$  $\displaystyle \Phi(MN)=\Phi(M)\Phi(N)$  $\displaystyle \Phi(1_R)=1$ ( Some references don't require this condition ) for $\displaystyle M,N\in R$. In this case, $\displaystyle \Phi$ will be a ring homomorphism. Finally, $\displaystyle \Phi$ is a surjective (onto) application because : $\displaystyle \forall a\in\mathbb{R}, \exists M=aI_2\in R,\quad\phi(M)=a.$  

Tags 
homomorphisms, ring, understanding 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
ring homomorphisms  tiger4  Abstract Algebra  0  April 20th, 2012 09:21 PM 
Ring homomorphisms and kernel  norway9k  Abstract Algebra  2  November 16th, 2010 11:28 PM 
True/False about Homomorphisms and Zero Divisors  jkong05  Abstract Algebra  1  May 5th, 2009 02:41 AM 
commutative diagram, module homomorphisms  fermatprime371  Abstract Algebra  0  December 8th, 2008 06:44 PM 
homomorphisms  mathstresser  Abstract Algebra  0  November 18th, 2007 01:00 PM 